* Peter Eisentraut (pete...@gmx.net) wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 15:11 +0100, Anders Steinlein wrote:
> > Is there any interest in expanding \dn+ to show schema size, similar
> > to table sizes using \dt+ in 8.4? We use separate schemas for each
> > user, so this would allow us to quickly lo
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 15:11 +0100, Anders Steinlein wrote:
> > Is there any interest in expanding \dn+ to show schema size, similar
> > to table sizes using \dt+ in 8.4? We use separate schemas for each
> > user, so this would allow us t
On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 15:11 +0100, Anders Steinlein wrote:
> Is there any interest in expanding \dn+ to show schema size, similar
> to table sizes using \dt+ in 8.4? We use separate schemas for each
> user, so this would allow us to quickly look up the sizes of each
> user's data.
A schema d
Le mercredi 28 octobre 2009 à 15:11:31, Anders Steinlein a écrit :
> Is there any interest in expanding \dn+ to show schema size, similar
> to table sizes using \dt+ in 8.4? We use separate schemas for each
> user, so this would allow us to quickly look up the sizes of each
> user's data.
>
> I ha
Is there any interest in expanding \dn+ to show schema size, similar
to table sizes using \dt+ in 8.4? We use separate schemas for each
user, so this would allow us to quickly look up the sizes of each
user's data.
I have little experience with C and none with the PostgreSQL code base
--
