Re: [HACKERS] Size of regression database

2014-11-14 Thread Tom Lane
Alvaro Herrera writes: >> Tom Lane wrote: >>> A quick eyeball check says that that quintupling of the database size >>> is all in BRIN index tests. Could we dial that back to something a >>> bit saner please? > Done: > http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=86cf9a56506

Re: [HACKERS] Size of regression database

2014-11-14 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > I was testing backwards compatibility of pg_dumpall just now, and was > > somewhat astonished to notice the size of the output for the regression > > database compared to what it was not too long ago: > > > > -rw-rw-r--. 1 tgl tgl 4509135 Nov 13 16:19 d

Re: [HACKERS] Size of regression database

2014-11-14 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Tom Lane wrote: > I was testing backwards compatibility of pg_dumpall just now, and was > somewhat astonished to notice the size of the output for the regression > database compared to what it was not too long ago: > > -rw-rw-r--. 1 tgl tgl 4509135 Nov 13 16:19 dumpall.83 > -rw-rw-r--. 1 tgl tgl

[HACKERS] Size of regression database

2014-11-13 Thread Tom Lane
I was testing backwards compatibility of pg_dumpall just now, and was somewhat astonished to notice the size of the output for the regression database compared to what it was not too long ago: -rw-rw-r--. 1 tgl tgl 4509135 Nov 13 16:19 dumpall.83 -rw-rw-r--. 1 tgl tgl 4514441 Nov 13 16:24 dumpal