On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 05:00:36PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> I'm working over the "kerberos service principal name" patch that's in
> the queue to make it good enough for application. During which I noticed
> it touches both kerberos 4 and kerberos 5 code, which leads me to two
> questions:
>
"Magnus Hagander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 1) Does anybody actually use Kerberos v4?
The last time it was proposed that we remove it, somebody popped up and
said they were still using it. You could check the archives and try to
contact that person for help in testing.
If there's no one will
I'm working over the "kerberos service principal name" patch that's in
the queue to make it good enough for application. During which I noticed
it touches both kerberos 4 and kerberos 5 code, which leads me to two
questions:
1) Does anybody actually use Kerberos v4? Considering it's been declared
