Re: [HACKERS] Strange left join problems in 8.1

2005-12-04 Thread Mario Weilguni
Title: AW: [HACKERS] Strange left join problems in 8.1 I've tried this with cvs , -r REL8_1_STABLE (hope this was the right one), and works flawless now. Thanks a lot! Best regards Mario Weilguni -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Sa

[HACKERS] Strange left join problems in 8.1

2005-12-03 Thread Mario Weilguni
I've quite interesting results in 8.1, I'm not sure if the queries itself are beyond SQL specs, but the results are quite interesting: This is the most simple I found for the query that still has the problem, the second left join is not really necessary and can be replaced Correct

Re: [HACKERS] Strange left join problems in 8.1

2005-12-03 Thread Tom Lane
Mario Weilguni [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It seems like the planner is pulling the last where condition into the second left join, evaluating it in wrong order. Can you try this on 8.1 branch tip? It sounds suspiciously similar to an already-fixed issue (see reports from Sebastian Böck around

Re: [HACKERS] Strange left join problems in 8.1

2005-12-03 Thread Mario Weilguni
Can you try this on 8.1 branch tip? It sounds suspiciously similar to an already-fixed issue (see reports from Sebastian Böck around mid-November). You haven't provided a complete test case so I really can't investigate for myself ... regards, tom lane Of course I

Re: [HACKERS] Strange left join problems in 8.1

2005-12-03 Thread Tom Lane
Mario Weilguni [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Of course I can give it a try, do I need to re-initdb when I use cvs to checkout 8.1 tip? No, not if you're on 8.1 final (or anything post-beta4, IIRC). Just be sure to use the same configure arguments as before (pg_config can help remind you if you