Bruce Momjian wrote:
Uh, I thought the shoot-down was for duplication of existing
information in new system tables, not the addition of new system
table information, e.g. we have pg_operator, but no list of error
codes or keywords in the system tables.
System tables are primarily useful if
Bruce,
I do like this idea. Can you make a general patch? Do others like the
idea of system tables showing error codes and keywords?
Yes. However, I think the idea of additional system views has already been
shot down in flames.
Unless people think that it's reasonable to have a system
Josh Berkus wrote:
Bruce,
I do like this idea. Can you make a general patch? Do others like the
idea of system tables showing error codes and keywords?
Yes. However, I think the idea of additional system views has already been
shot down in flames.
Unless people think that it's
On Monday 06 June 2005 17:35, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Josh Berkus wrote:
Bruce,
I do like this idea. Can you make a general patch? Do others like the
idea of system tables showing error codes and keywords?
Yes. However, I think the idea of additional system views has already
been
Robert Treat wrote:
On Monday 06 June 2005 17:35, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Josh Berkus wrote:
Bruce,
I do like this idea. Can you make a general patch? Do others like the
idea of system tables showing error codes and keywords?
Yes. However, I think the idea of additional
I do like this idea. Can you make a general patch? Do others like the
idea of system tables showing error codes and keywords?
---
David Fetter wrote:
On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 12:49:47AM +0100, Gaetano Mendola wrote:
This has been saved for the 8.1 release:
http:/momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches2
---
David Fetter wrote:
On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 12:49:47AM +0100, Gaetano Mendola wrote:
Josh Berkus wrote:
Neil,
Josh Berkus wrote:
Neil,
pg_functions might be useful, but what would pg_users offer that pg_user
does not already do?
Show a list of groups that the user belongs to? Same thing with pg_groups;
showing the list of users in the group.
A pg_sequences view might also be handy.
Yes. Anything
On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 12:49:47AM +0100, Gaetano Mendola wrote:
Josh Berkus wrote:
Neil,
pg_functions might be useful, but what would pg_users offer that pg_user
does not already do?
Show a list of groups that the user belongs to? Same thing with
pg_groups; showing the list of
Folks,
Is there any reason that we don't have pg_functions, pg_users, pg_groups and
other system views?pg_tables and pg_views is really useful, but it would
be good to cover the other items as well.
Is there a reason not to have these other than that they're not coded? If
not, I'll get
On Fri, 2004-10-29 at 07:35, Josh Berkus wrote:
Is there any reason that we don't have pg_functions, pg_users, pg_groups and
other system views?pg_tables and pg_views is really useful, but it would
be good to cover the other items as well.
pg_functions might be useful, but what would
Neil,
pg_functions might be useful, but what would pg_users offer that pg_user
does not already do?
Show a list of groups that the user belongs to? Same thing with pg_groups;
showing the list of users in the group.
A pg_sequences view might also be handy.
Yes. Anything else? So far I
12 matches
Mail list logo
