On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 06:56:06PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Do we care to maintain a maximum width for programs' --help output (and
> > psql's
> > \?)? I think 79 characters was once a recommendation (or perhaps 72), but
> > we
> > have a couple of violations
Alvaro Herrera a écrit :
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Do we care to maintain a maximum width for programs' --help output (and
>> psql's
>> \?)? I think 79 characters was once a recommendation (or perhaps 72), but
>> we
>> have a couple of violations either way, which I'd like to fix, but what
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 16:04:46 -0500
> Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Do we care to maintain a maximum width for programs' --help output
> > > (and psql's \?)?
On Nov 15, 2007 4:56 PM, Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Do we care to maintain a maximum width for programs' --help output (and
> > psql's
> > \?)? I think 79 characters was once a recommendation (or perhaps 72), but
> > we
> > have a couple of violations
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Do we care to maintain a maximum width for programs' --help output (and
> psql's
> \?)? I think 79 characters was once a recommendation (or perhaps 72), but we
> have a couple of violations either way, which I'd like to fix, but what to?
79 is perfect IMHO. It would
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Do we care to maintain a maximum width for programs' --help output (and
> psql's
> \?)? I think 79 characters was once a recommendation (or perhaps 72), but we
> have a couple of violations either way, which I'd like to fix, but what to?
I think 7
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Do we care to maintain a maximum width for programs' --help output (and psql's
\?)? I think 79 characters was once a recommendation (or perhaps 72), but we
have a couple of violations either way, which I'd like to fix, but what to?
Yea,
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Also it would rock if translation kept the alignment in various output.
Theoretically the translators are supposed to do that already ...
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 16:04:46 -0500
Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Do we care to maintain a maximum width for programs' --help output
> > (and psql's \?)? I think 79 characters was once a recomme
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Do we care to maintain a maximum width for programs' --help output (and
> psql's
> \?)? I think 79 characters was once a recommendation (or perhaps 72), but we
> have a couple of violations either way, which I'd like to fix, but what to?
Yea, I went over with the pg_c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 21:58:28 +0100
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do we care to maintain a maximum width for programs' --help output
> (and psql's \?)? I think 79 characters was once a recommendation (or
> perhaps 72), but we have a co
Do we care to maintain a maximum width for programs' --help output (and psql's
\?)? I think 79 characters was once a recommendation (or perhaps 72), but we
have a couple of violations either way, which I'd like to fix, but what to?
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
12 matches
Mail list logo
