Tom Lane writes:
> I think a reasonable choice in cross-compiling situations would be to
> assume int64 works if we have a long long int datatype, but to force use
> of our own snprintf rather than trusting to luck with the platform's.
That's approximately what's happening. Formerly it insisted
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Peter Eisentraut - PostgreSQL) writes:
> The code that checks for the 64-bit int type now gives more reasonable
> results when cross-compiling: In that case we just take the compiler's
> information and trust that the arithmetic works. Disabling int64 is too
>
