On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 18:35 -0700, David Fetter wrote:
> I'm sure I'm not the first to bring up this way of doing pg_upgrade,
> but perhaps I can help seed a fruitful discussion on the matter.
> Ideally, these transformations would be both idempotent and
> reversible, although I understand that th
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 02:41:13PM +1000, Neil Conway wrote:
> David Fetter wrote:
> >As background, I'd like to go over our policy of, "The code patch
> >must be accompanied by any doc patches that it implies."
>
> Although it is worth noting this policy is not religiously followed
> anyway (e.g.
David Fetter wrote:
As background, I'd like to go over our policy of, "The code patch must
be accompanied by any doc patches that it implies."
Although it is worth noting this policy is not religiously followed
anyway (e.g. the recent roles patch). I think we basically assume that
the person
Folks,
I'm sure I'm not the first to bring up this way of doing pg_upgrade,
but perhaps I can help seed a fruitful discussion on the matter.
As background, I'd like to go over our policy of, "The code patch must
be accompanied by any doc patches that it implies." I believe that
this policy is go