On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 06:20:04PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
>
> Hi David,
>
> On 2016/12/15 18:09, David Fetter wrote:
> > Per Thomas Munro, could it be that the CREATE ... PARTITION OF ...
> > code fails to run CacheInvalidateRelcache on its parent(s)?
>
> Thomas's right. There is a patch
Hi David,
On 2016/12/15 18:09, David Fetter wrote:
> Per Thomas Munro, could it be that the CREATE ... PARTITION OF ... code
> fails to run CacheInvalidateRelcache on its parent(s)?
Thomas's right. There is a patch posted for this issue [1]; I'm sending
an updated version of the patch later
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 12:23:24AM -0800, David Fetter wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I'm having some trouble understanding what's going on here. When I \i
> the file in 55caaaeba877eac1feb6481fb413fa04ae9046ac without starting
> a transaction explicitly, it produces the expected results. When I \i
> it
Folks,
I'm having some trouble understanding what's going on here. When I \i
the file in 55caaaeba877eac1feb6481fb413fa04ae9046ac without starting
a transaction explicitly, it produces the expected results. When I \i
it after a BEGIN, not so much.
What's going on?
Best,
David.
