[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marc G. Fournier) writes:
On Thu, 1 Apr 2004, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
Is your timeline based on the assumption of doing all the work
yourself? If so, how about farming out some of it? I'd be
willing to contribute some effort to PITR. (It's been made clear
to
Simon Riggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[ expecting to finish PITR by early June ]
Is this all still OK for 7.5? (My attempts at cataloguing changes has
fallen by the wayside in concentrating on the more important task of
PITR.) Do we have a planned freeze month yet?
There's not really a plan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
snip
I'd be willing to contribute some effort to PITR. (It's been made clear
to me that Red Hat really wants PITR in 7.5 ;-))
Wow! That's exciting news :-) Does Red Hat also want some more enterprise
* Tom Lane ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Is your timeline based on the assumption of doing all the work yourself?
If so, how about farming out some of it? I'd be willing to contribute
some effort to PITR. (It's been made clear to me that Red Hat really
wants PITR in 7.5 ;-))
Hey, us Debian
Tom Lane wrote:
Simon Riggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[ expecting to finish PITR by early June ]
Is this all still OK for 7.5? (My attempts at cataloguing changes has
fallen by the wayside in concentrating on the more important task of
PITR.) Do we have a planned freeze month yet?
Devrim GUNDUZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
BTW... PITR, Windows port, possibly Tablespaces and more... Does the
core team intend to use 8.0 instead of 7.5?
It's premature to have that discussion yet, IMHO. When we get close
to beta and know what the feature list will look like, we can think
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
Is this all still OK for 7.5? (My attempts at cataloguing changes has
fallen by the wayside in concentrating on the more important task of
PITR.) Do we have a planned freeze month yet?
There's not
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
Devrim GUNDUZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
BTW... PITR, Windows port, possibly Tablespaces and more... Does the
core team intend to use 8.0 instead of 7.5?
It's premature to have that discussion yet, IMHO. When we get close
to beta and know what the
Bruce Momjian wrote
Tom Lane wrote:
Simon Riggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[ expecting to finish PITR by early June ]
Is this all still OK for 7.5? (My attempts at cataloguing
changes has
fallen by the wayside in concentrating on the more
important task of
PITR.) Do we have a
Is your timeline based on the assumption of doing all the work yourself?
If so, how about farming out some of it? I'd be willing to contribute
some effort to PITR. (It's been made clear to me that Red Hat really
wants PITR in 7.5 ;-))
What is RedHat's interest in PostgreSQL? Last time I heard
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
Is your timeline based on the assumption of doing all the work yourself?
If so, how about farming out some of it? I'd be willing to contribute
some effort to PITR. (It's been made clear to me that Red Hat really
wants PITR in 7.5 ;-))
What is RedHat's
On Thu, 1 Apr 2004, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
Is your timeline based on the assumption of doing all the work yourself?
If so, how about farming out some of it? I'd be willing to contribute
some effort to PITR. (It's been made clear to me that Red Hat really
wants PITR in 7.5 ;-))
A brief update on PITR status:
I've completed successful unit testing of the PostgreSQL client-side
code for the XLogArchive API. Just about to start moving on to pg_arch
and the archiver side code. At this rate, I should have a
system-testable set of patches in around 2 weeks time for the first
13 matches
Mail list logo
