Hi,
2009/3/10 Heikki Linnakangas :
> Fujii Masao wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 10:20 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks. This patch seems to be missing the new readahead.c file. I
>>> grabbed
>>> that from the previous patch version.
>>
>> Oh, sorry for the mistake. I
Fujii Masao wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 10:20 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
wrote:
Thanks. This patch seems to be missing the new readahead.c file. I grabbed
that from the previous patch version.
Oh, sorry for the mistake. I changed one of Suzuki-san's patches
to be rebased to HEAD again (rea
Fujii Masao wrote:
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Fujii Masao wrote:
Hi Suzuki-san,
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 5:03 AM, Koichi Suzuki wrote:
My reply to Gregory's comment didn't have any objections. I believe,
as I posted to Wiki page, latest posted patch is okay and waiting for
review.
One
Appreciate for your kind help!
2009/3/3 Fujii Masao :
> On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Fujii Masao wrote:
>> Hi Suzuki-san,
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 5:03 AM, Koichi Suzuki wrote:
>>> My reply to Gregory's comment didn't have any objections. I believe,
>>> as I posted to Wiki page, latest
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Fujii Masao wrote:
> Hi Suzuki-san,
>
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 5:03 AM, Koichi Suzuki wrote:
>> My reply to Gregory's comment didn't have any objections. I believe,
>> as I posted to Wiki page, latest posted patch is okay and waiting for
>> review.
>
> One of yo
Hi Suzuki-san,
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 5:03 AM, Koichi Suzuki wrote:
> My reply to Gregory's comment didn't have any objections. I believe,
> as I posted to Wiki page, latest posted patch is okay and waiting for
> review.
One of your latest patches doesn't match with HEAD, so I updated it.
Re
Hi,
My reply to Gregory's comment didn't have any objections. I believe,
as I posted to Wiki page, latest posted patch is okay and waiting for
review.
2009/2/24 Robert Haas :
> On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 7:15 AM, Gregory Stark wrote:
>> Koichi Suzuki writes:
>>
>>> Please find enclosed 2nd patch
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 7:15 AM, Gregory Stark wrote:
> Koichi Suzuki writes:
>
>> Please find enclosed 2nd patch of pg_readahead which include a patch
>> to bufer manager to skip prefetch of pages already in shared buffer.
>
> I'm a bit confused by this comment. PrefetchBuffer already checks if
Hi,
This is also a reply to your latest post.I'm replying to the older
one because I need original text.
2009/1/26 Koichi Suzuki :
> Hi,
>
> It's simply because we should not refer to system catalog during the recovery.
This is the reason why I didn't use PrefetchBuffer(). Prefetch
buffer
Koichi Suzuki writes:
> It's simply because we should not refer to system catalog during the recovery.
I don't understand how this is connected to anything to do with prefetching?
--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Ask me about EnterpriseDB's On-Demand P
Hi,
It's simply because we should not refer to system catalog during the recovery.
2009/1/25 Gregory Stark :
>
> Koichi Suzuki writes:
>
>> Please find enclosed 2nd patch of pg_readahead which include a patch
>> to bufer manager to skip prefetch of pages already in shared buffer.
>
> I'm a bit c
Koichi Suzuki writes:
> Please find enclosed 2nd patch of pg_readahead which include a patch
> to bufer manager to skip prefetch of pages already in shared buffer.
I'm a bit confused by this comment. PrefetchBuffer already checks if the page
is in shared buffers.
What is tricky to avoid is pr
"Koichi Suzuki" wrote:
> > This patc also include additional patch for posix_fadvise to skip
> > prefetch of pages which does not exist.
I reviewed your patch and found items to be fixed and improved.
- You should not claim your copyrights.
There are your copyright claims in two files newly ad
Sorry, I didn't attatch the patch file. This is the second try.
2009/1/12 Koichi Suzuki :
> This is V4 patch to improve file read during startup for review.
>
> Basic algorithm is same as V3 but works with Gregory's fadvise patch.
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-01/msg00026.
This is V4 patch to improve file read during startup for review.
Basic algorithm is same as V3 but works with Gregory's fadvise patch.
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-01/msg00026.php
This patc also include additional patch for posix_fadvise to skip
prefetch of pages which does
15 matches
Mail list logo
