Bruce Momjian wrote:
Jan Wieck wrote:
On 8/6/2004 9:04 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Updated. Thanks.
I thought we want to have the feature activated ... I reversed your
change and brought guc.c in sync instead.
Uh, if the guy is doing a vacuum at night, does he want the delay?
Seems someone
On 8/6/2004 11:34 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Jan Wieck wrote:
On 8/6/2004 9:04 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Updated. Thanks.
I thought we want to have the feature activated ... I reversed your
change and brought guc.c in sync instead.
Uh, if the guy is doing a vacuum at night, does he want the delay?
Jan Wieck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Good that autovacuum didn't make it then, those people would have had a
big surprise :-)
If autovacuum had made it, would you expect someone to have enabled it
by default? Without advance discussion?
regards, tom lane
Jan Wieck wrote:
On 8/6/2004 11:34 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Jan Wieck wrote:
On 8/6/2004 9:04 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Updated. Thanks.
I thought we want to have the feature activated ... I reversed your
change and brought guc.c in sync instead.
Uh, if the guy is doing a
Updated. Thanks.
---
Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
Related to autovacuum work, I was looking into the new vacuum delay
functionality. I might be missing something, but I can't find anything
on it in the developer docs.
On 8/6/2004 9:04 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Updated. Thanks.
I thought we want to have the feature activated ... I reversed your
change and brought guc.c in sync instead.
Jan
---
Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
Related to
Jan Wieck wrote:
On 8/6/2004 9:04 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Updated. Thanks.
I thought we want to have the feature activated ... I reversed your
change and brought guc.c in sync instead.
OK.
--
Bruce Momjian| http://candle.pha.pa.us
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jan Wieck wrote:
On 8/6/2004 9:04 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Updated. Thanks.
I thought we want to have the feature activated ... I reversed your
change and brought guc.c in sync instead.
Uh, if the guy is doing a vacuum at night, does he want the delay?
Seems someone should have to
Matthew T. O'Connor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Related to autovacuum work, I was looking into the new vacuum delay
functionality. I might be missing something, but I can't find anything
on it in the developer docs. Is that right?
You are not missing anything. I already nagged Jan about this
On Sun, Jul 18, 2004 at 02:32:10AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Matthew T. O'Connor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Related to autovacuum work, I was looking into the new vacuum
delay functionality. I might be missing something, but I can't
find anything on it in the developer docs. Is that right?
Related to autovacuum work, I was looking into the new vacuum delay
functionality. I might be missing something, but I can't find anything
on it in the developer docs. Is that right?
Also, in the default postgresql.conf there is:
#vacuum_cost_naptime = 50 # 0-1000 milliseconds
however
Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
Related to autovacuum work, I was looking into the new vacuum delay
functionality. I might be missing something, but I can't find anything
on it in the developer docs. Is that right?
Also, in the default postgresql.conf there is:
#vacuum_cost_naptime = 50
12 matches
Mail list logo