On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 2:56 AM, Radosław Smogura
rsmog...@softperience.eu wrote:
Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com Thursday 10 February 2011 08:48:26
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Radosław Smogura
Since there is basically zero difference in how *varchar* is handled
in the database for the
On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 10:59:45PM +0100, Rados??aw Smogura wrote:
I do performance tests against orignal JDBC driver and my version in binary
and in text mode. I saw strange results when I was reading varchar values.
Here is some output from simple benchmark
Plain strings speed
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Radosław Smogura
rsmog...@softperience.eu wrote:
Hi,
I do performance tests against orignal JDBC driver and my version in binary
and in text mode. I saw strange results when I was reading varchar values.
Here is some output from simple benchmark
Plain strings
Actually difference is
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-02/msg00415.php
Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com Thursday 10 February 2011 08:48:26
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Radosław Smogura
rsmog...@softperience.eu wrote:
Hi,
I do performance tests against orignal JDBC
Hi,
I do performance tests against orignal JDBC driver and my version in binary
and in text mode. I saw strange results when I was reading varchar values.
Here is some output from simple benchmark
Plain strings speed Execution: 8316582, local: 2116608, all:
10433190
Binary
