On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> =?utf-8?q?Rados=C5=82aw_Smogura?= writes:
>> I'm sending small patch for textsend. It reduces unnecessary copies, and
>> memory usage for duplication of varlena data. May you look?
>
> This code will break the day that text and bytea don't have t
Just from curious may I ask in which direction this will go, and how this will
affect performance of text and binary format?
Actually I started to make smaller improvements, and I think about one big to
encode text (when client and server encoding are different) directly to
StringInfo, without
=?utf-8?q?Rados=C5=82aw_Smogura?= writes:
> I'm sending small patch for textsend. It reduces unnecessary copies, and
> memory usage for duplication of varlena data. May you look?
This code will break the day that text and bytea don't have the same
internal representation, which seems likely to b
Hi,
I'm sending small patch for textsend. It reduces unnecessary copies, and
memory usage for duplication of varlena data. May you look?
Kind regards,
Radosław Smogura
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/adt/varlena.c b/src/backend/utils/adt/varlena.c
index e111d26..f24bbcd 100644
--- a/src/backend/u
