Peter Eisentraut writes:
> On 2/8/14, 4:41 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> + Release notes for all versions of PostgreSQL can be found on-line at
>> + http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/release.html
> Should be "current" instead of "devel"?
>> +
>> + In a distribution file set, release notes fo
On 2/8/14, 4:41 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> diff --git a/HISTORY b/HISTORY
> index ...360c7f6 .
> *** a/HISTORY
> --- b/HISTORY
> ***
> *** 0
> --- 1,6
> + Release notes for all versions of PostgreSQL can be found on-line at
> + http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/release.ht
On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
>> Gavin Flower writes:
>>> How about adding URL's for the online versions of HISTORY & README's (or
>>> their rough equivalents - perhaps the online version of the latest
>>> 'Appendix E. Release Notes' would be sufficient?) to the INSTA
I wrote:
> Gavin Flower writes:
>> How about adding URL's for the online versions of HISTORY & README's (or
>> their rough equivalents - perhaps the online version of the latest
>> 'Appendix E. Release Notes' would be sufficient?) to the INSTALL file?
> Actually, what I had in mind was to repla
Gavin Flower writes:
> How about adding URL's for the online versions of HISTORY & README's (or
> their rough equivalents - perhaps the online version of the latest
> 'Appendix E. Release Notes' would be sufficient?) to the INSTALL file?
Actually, what I had in mind was to replace the dynamical
On 08/02/14 19:05, Tom Lane wrote:
Peter Eisentraut writes:
On 2/3/14, 8:48 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
That's a very fair question. It's a reasonable bet that pretty much
nobody actually looks at the text versions of either HISTORY or
regress_README anymore. It's conceivable that somebody somewhere
Peter Eisentraut writes:
> On 2/3/14, 8:48 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> That's a very fair question. It's a reasonable bet that pretty much
>> nobody actually looks at the text versions of either HISTORY or
>> regress_README anymore. It's conceivable that somebody somewhere makes
>> use of the text ve
On 2/3/14, 8:48 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> That's a very fair question. It's a reasonable bet that pretty much
> nobody actually looks at the text versions of either HISTORY or
> regress_README anymore. It's conceivable that somebody somewhere makes
> use of the text version of INSTALL when trying to
Noah Misch writes:
>> Robert Haas writes:
>>> I wonder if these standalone things are really worthwhile.
> I wonder how difficult it would be to make sufficient link data available when
> building the standalone files. There would be no linking per se; we would
> just need the referent's text f
Robert Haas writes:
> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> guaibasaurus doesn't like this patch: you need to be more careful
>> about links, because the regression instructions are supposed to
>> compile as a standalone document.
> I wonder if these standalone things are really wor
10 matches
Mail list logo
