On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 5:20 AM, Radosław Smogura
rsmog...@softperience.eu wrote:
Just patch for missing procedures for void send/recv
What problem does this fix?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 07:01:02 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 5:20 AM, Radosław Smogura
rsmog...@softperience.eu wrote:
Just patch for missing procedures for void send/recv
What problem does this fix?
Can not execute stored procedures in JDBC with out arguments, I think
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 6:01 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 5:20 AM, Radosław Smogura
rsmog...@softperience.eu wrote:
Just patch for missing procedures for void send/recv
What problem does this fix?
void returning functions may not be called when binary
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 08:12:23 -0600, Merlin Moncure wrote:
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 6:01 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 5:20 AM, Radosław Smogura
rsmog...@softperience.eu wrote:
Just patch for missing procedures for void send/recv
What problem does this
Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 6:01 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
What problem does this fix?
void returning functions may not be called when binary protocol is
requested currently. this is annoying: some drivers that wrap libpq
or the
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 6:01 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
What problem does this fix?
void returning functions may not be called when binary protocol is
requested
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 8:22 AM, rsmogura rsmog...@softperience.eu wrote:
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 08:12:23 -0600, Merlin Moncure wrote:
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 6:01 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 5:20 AM, Radosław Smogura
rsmog...@softperience.eu wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Yeah, this has been discussed before.
Even though this patch is far past the CF deadline, I'm a bit tempted to
push it into 9.1 anyway, just so we can check off that problem.
+1.
Just patch for missing procedures for void send/recv
Regards,
Radek
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/adt/pseudotypes.c b/src/backend/utils/adt/pseudotypes.c
index d9329f8..614eb98 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/adt/pseudotypes.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/adt/pseudotypes.c
@@ -212,7 +212,20 @@
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 11:20:22AM +0100, Radosław Smogura wrote:
Just patch for missing procedures for void send/recv
Regards,
Radek
Thanks! :)
Style note: the project doesn't use // as a comment-to-end-of-line in
C because some supported compilers don't understand it.
Cheers,
David.
--
10 matches
Mail list logo
