So if you do this, do you still need to store that information in
pg_control at all?
Yes: to speeds up the recovery process.
If it's going to slow down the performance of my database when not doing
recovery (because I have to write two files for every transaction,
rather than one)
Added to TODO:
* Allow WAL information to recover corrupted pg_controldata
...
Using pg_control to get the checkpoint position
speeds up the
recovery process, but to handle possible
corruption of pg_control,
we should actually implement the reading of
On Tue, 18 Feb 2003, Mikheev, Vadim wrote:
So if you do this, do you still need to store that information in
pg_control at all?
Yes: to speeds up the recovery process.
If it's going to slow down the performance of my database when not doing
recovery (because I have to write two files for
