Re: [HACKERS] Webcluster session storage, was vacuum, performance, and MVCC

2006-06-23 Thread Martijn van Oosterhout
On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 10:31:22AM -0400, James Robinson wrote: > Regarding the best place for session data, memcached isn't really the > answer, for opposite reasons as to why it isn't so great to store it > in the central DB for a bug web farm. The thought that occurred to me while reading t

[HACKERS] Webcluster session storage, was vacuum, performance, and MVCC

2006-06-23 Thread James Robinson
Verging on offtopic, but ... Regarding the best place for session data, memcached isn't really the answer, for opposite reasons as to why it isn't so great to store it in the central DB for a bug web farm. Folks on the memcached lists propose this [ "I keep all my session data in memcache