On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 8:37 AM, crocket crockabisc...@gmail.com wrote:
MySQL permits a connection to access multiple databases.
But Postgresql restricts a connection to one database.
I think postgresql database connection is somewhat limited.
Is it an old and decrepit design? or does it
functional gap here. I am not sure I'd bother implementing the
multi-database concept today if we didn't have it already ... but it
seems kind of pointless to rip it out given that it's already there.
It's very useful for webhosts. You can give each user their own private
database and not
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 8:37 AM, crocket crockabisc...@gmail.com wrote:
MySQL permits a connection to access multiple databases.
But Postgresql restricts a connection to one database.
I think postgresql database
MySQL permits a connection to access multiple databases.
But Postgresql restricts a connection to one database.
I think postgresql database connection is somewhat limited.
Is it an old and decrepit design? or does it deserve some appreciations?
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list
On 30 October 2012 12:37, crocket crockabisc...@gmail.com wrote:
MySQL permits a connection to access multiple databases.
But Postgresql restricts a connection to one database.
I think postgresql database connection is somewhat limited.
Is it an old and decrepit design? or does it deserve
On 10/30/2012 01:37 PM, crocket wrote:
MySQL permits a connection to access multiple databases.
But Postgresql restricts a connection to one database.
I think postgresql database connection is somewhat limited.
Is it an old and decrepit design? or does it deserve some appreciations?
It's an