Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Why do index access methods use LP_DELETE?
>
> My recollection is that I deliberately used LP_DELETE for the
> known-dead-tuple marker so that there couldn't be any confusion with
> the use of LP_USED. AFAIR, LP_USED isn't actually used in indexes,
> so we
ITAGAKI Takahiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Why do index access methods use LP_DELETE?
My recollection is that I deliberately used LP_DELETE for the
known-dead-tuple marker so that there couldn't be any confusion with
the use of LP_USED. AFAIR, LP_USED isn't actually used in indexes,
so we cou
Hi Hackers,
I found index access methods use LP_DELETE for invisible tuples,
but it seems to be ok to remove LP_USED instead of adding LP_DELETE.
I tried the following simple replacements:
- '|= LP_DELETE' => '&= ~LP_USED'
- 'ItemIdDeleted' => '!ItemIdIsUsed'
and then, it passed all regressio
