On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 5:51 PM, Jim Nasby wrote:
> On Aug 23, 2011, at 1:57 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>> Ultimately my ulterior motive is to make sure the information schema
>>> is actually useful and ensure that it maintains that status.
>>
>> The information schema only exposes privileges de
On Aug 23, 2011, at 1:57 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Ultimately my ulterior motive is to make sure the information schema
>> is actually useful and ensure that it maintains that status.
>
> The information schema only exposes privileges defined in the SQL
> standard on objects defined in the SQ
On tis, 2011-08-23 at 12:48 -0400, Dave Cramer wrote:
> Recently a bug was reported on the JDBC list regarding table
> privileges. It turns out that we have not been parsing the ACL tables
> correctly. This is partially due to having to track the catalogs
> through each version. So this breaks down
Recently a bug was reported on the JDBC list regarding table
privileges. It turns out that we have not been parsing the ACL tables
correctly. This is partially due to having to track the catalogs
through each version. So this breaks down into two questions
1) is it possible to get all of the ACL d
