On mån, 2012-01-16 at 22:00 -0500, Greg Smith wrote:
Adjusting that expectation is another side to pragmatism based on
recent history I think needs to be acknowledged, but is unlikely to be
improved on. 9.0 shipped on September 20. 9.1 shipped on September
11. If we say the last CF of each
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
On mån, 2012-01-16 at 22:00 -0500, Greg Smith wrote:
Adjusting that expectation is another side to pragmatism based on
recent history I think needs to be acknowledged, but is unlikely to be
improved on. 9.0 shipped on
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Greg Smith g...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
I would have sworn I left this next to the bike shed...from the crickets
chirping I guess not. I did complete bumping forward the patches that
slipped through the November CF the other day, and it's properly closed now.
On 1/16/12 11:42 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
But, I've noticed that nothing good comes of me pressing my own view
too hard. Either we as a community value having the CommitFest wrap
up in a reasonable period of time, or we don't.
Reality is, alas, not nearly so binary as this, and therin lie the
On 01/16/2012 02:42 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
But, I've noticed that nothing good comes of me pressing my own view
too hard. Either we as a community value having the CommitFest wrap
up in a reasonable period of time, or we don't. If we do, then let's
make it happen together. If we don't, then
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 7:01 PM, Greg Smith g...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
I think this is getting more predictable simply based on having some
history. The trail blazing you led here for some time didn't know what was
and wasn't possible yet. I feel that the basic shape of things, while still
On 01/16/2012 08:27 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
the last two release cycles I've put huge amounts of energy
into trying to get the release stable enough to release before July
and August roll around and everybody disappears. It didn't work,
either time. If that's not going to happen anyway, then
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:00 PM, Greg Smith g...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 01/16/2012 08:27 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
the last two release cycles I've put huge amounts of energy
into trying to get the release stable enough to release before July
and August roll around and everybody disappears.
On 01/09/2012 09:56 PM, Greg Smith wrote:
The main question still lingering about is the viability of pushing
out an 9.2alpha3 at this point. That was originally scheduled for
December 20th. There was a whole lot of active code whacking still in
progress that week though. And as soon as
Shouldn't it have been closed weeks ago?
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
On 09.01.2012 20:37, Josh Berkus wrote:
Shouldn't it have been closed weeks ago?
There are still patches in Needs Review and Ready for Committer
states...
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list
On 1/9/12 10:39 AM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 09.01.2012 20:37, Josh Berkus wrote:
Shouldn't it have been closed weeks ago?
There are still patches in Needs Review and Ready for Committer
states...
Well, at this point I think we should bump them to CF4. Certainly
nobody is working on
On 1/9/12 1:37 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
Shouldn't it have been closed weeks ago?
It's still In Progress mostly because I flaked out for the holidays
after pushing to get most things ready for commit or returned a few
weeks ago, but not quite nailing it shut. I'm back to mostly full-time
on
13 matches
Mail list logo
