Re: [HACKERS] XLogDir

2002-08-19 Thread Thomas Lockhart
Revert. The XLogDir change was incomplete and basically useless to start with ... Yea, but it was tied into the PGXLOG commit. Thomas, what are we doing with that? Why ask me? - Thomas ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4:

[HACKERS] XLogDir

2002-08-16 Thread Bruce Momjian
A recent change made XLogDir dynamically sized. There was a question of whether this was a good idea since there are lots of other places that use MAXPGPATH. I have now found that pg_resetxlog doesn't compile anymore because XLogDir is a char* now instead of a char[]. Should I fix pg_resetxlog

Re: [HACKERS] XLogDir

2002-08-16 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: A recent change made XLogDir dynamically sized. There was a question of whether this was a good idea since there are lots of other places that use MAXPGPATH. I have now found that pg_resetxlog doesn't compile anymore because XLogDir is a char* now

Re: [HACKERS] XLogDir

2002-08-16 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: A recent change made XLogDir dynamically sized. There was a question of whether this was a good idea since there are lots of other places that use MAXPGPATH. I have now found that pg_resetxlog doesn't compile anymore because