Re: [HACKERS] a new problem in MERGE

2010-11-21 Thread Robert Haas
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 2:41 PM, Greg Smith wrote: > Boxuan Zhai wrote: >> >> I have plan to fix the above two bugs together. (in fact, I have already >> started coding in merge_v202 edition). My question is how should I make my >> update be consistent with yours. Is it possible for you to give me

Re: [HACKERS] a new problem in MERGE

2010-11-14 Thread Greg Smith
Boxuan Zhai wrote: I have plan to fix the above two bugs together. (in fact, I have already started coding in merge_v202 edition). My question is how should I make my update be consistent with yours. Is it possible for you to give me an edition that I can work on? I just got this reconciled

[HACKERS] a new problem in MERGE

2010-10-30 Thread Boxuan Zhai
Dear Greg, How are you? As we talked last week, there is a bug about the "origslot" field assertion. TRAP: FailedAssertion("!(epqstate->origslot != ((void *)0))", File: "execMain.c", Line: 1732) I checked my codes and found the reason of this problem. In the original process of "ExecModifyTabl