Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Robert Haas writes:
> >> On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> >>> Per previous discussion, I'm going to wrap alpha5 Monday morning
> >>> Eastern time, barring objections.
> >
> >> It seems that the 'make d
Excerpts from Peter Eisentraut's message of mié abr 27 15:40:22 -0300 2011:
> On tis, 2011-04-26 at 11:36 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > This is a trivial patch (attached). The only problem with it is that
> > "make all" would fail if lynx is not installed.
>
> Well, that will probably not be a
On 04/27/2011 02:40 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On tis, 2011-04-26 at 11:36 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
This is a trivial patch (attached). The only problem with it is that
"make all" would fail if lynx is not installed.
Well, that will probably not be acceptable.
I rather think the action
On tis, 2011-04-26 at 11:36 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> This is a trivial patch (attached). The only problem with it is that
> "make all" would fail if lynx is not installed.
Well, that will probably not be acceptable.
I rather think the action item here is to set up a buildfarm-ish job
that
Excerpts from Heikki Linnakangas's message of mié abr 27 07:47:32 -0300 2011:
> On 26.04.2011 17:36, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >> I suggest having them be created in doc/src/sgml "all" target. This
> >> gets them in "make docs" and "make world" AFAICT.
> >
> > This is a trivial patch (attached). T
On 26.04.2011 17:36, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Excerpts from Alvaro Herrera's message of sáb abr 09 01:55:45 -0300 2011:
Excerpts from Peter Eisentraut's message of lun mar 28 17:00:01 -0300 2011:
On mån, 2011-03-28 at 09:35 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
Actually those are all my fault. Sorry, I'm st
Excerpts from Alvaro Herrera's message of sáb abr 09 01:55:45 -0300 2011:
> Excerpts from Peter Eisentraut's message of lun mar 28 17:00:01 -0300 2011:
> > On mån, 2011-03-28 at 09:35 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> > > Actually those are all my fault. Sorry, I'm still learning the ropes.
> > > I did
Excerpts from Peter Eisentraut's message of lun mar 28 17:00:01 -0300 2011:
> On mån, 2011-03-28 at 09:35 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> > Actually those are all my fault. Sorry, I'm still learning the ropes.
> > I didn't realize xref couldn't be used in the release notes; it looks
> > like Bruce us
On mån, 2011-03-28 at 09:35 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> Actually those are all my fault. Sorry, I'm still learning the ropes.
> I didn't realize xref couldn't be used in the release notes; it looks
> like Bruce used rather than for the things I used
> for.
>
> This is the sort of thing for wh
On 03/28/2011 09:25 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
Per previous discussion, I'm going to wrap alpha5 Monday morning
Eastern time, barring objections.
It seems that the 'make distcheck' build is broken. Apparently we
don't have any automated testin
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
>> Robert Haas writes:
>>> It seems that the 'make distcheck' build is broken. Apparently we
>>> don't have any automated testing of this? Anyone know what to fix
>>> here?
>
>> Bruce keeps trying to put cross-references where they mus
I wrote:
> Robert Haas writes:
>> It seems that the 'make distcheck' build is broken. Apparently we
>> don't have any automated testing of this? Anyone know what to fix
>> here?
> Bruce keeps trying to put cross-references where they mustn't go ...
Quick hack applied. I think there's a better
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas writes:
>> On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> Per previous discussion, I'm going to wrap alpha5 Monday morning
>>> Eastern time, barring objections.
>
>> It seems that the 'make distcheck' build is broken. Appar
Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of lun mar 28 10:26:59 -0300 2011:
> Robert Haas writes:
> > On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> >> Per previous discussion, I'm going to wrap alpha5 Monday morning
> >> Eastern time, barring objections.
>
> > It seems that the 'make distcheck'
Robert Haas writes:
> On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> Per previous discussion, I'm going to wrap alpha5 Monday morning
>> Eastern time, barring objections.
> It seems that the 'make distcheck' build is broken. Apparently we
> don't have any automated testing of this? Any
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> Per previous discussion, I'm going to wrap alpha5 Monday morning
> Eastern time, barring objections.
It seems that the 'make distcheck' build is broken. Apparently we
don't have any automated testing of this? Anyone know what to fix
here?
o
Per previous discussion, I'm going to wrap alpha5 Monday morning
Eastern time, barring objections.
This time, I'm going to try to make sure that announcements actually
go out; I dropped the ball on that last time.
If anyone wants to push time zone updates, translation updates, etc.,
I suppose now
17 matches
Mail list logo
