Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com writes:
The problem is that this one doesn't have the
Content-Disposition: attachment
line in the MIME header. I don't know what we can do about it.
It's sent with an inline attachment AFAICT, some MA will make it easy
to process the attachment and
Alex Shulgin a...@commandprompt.com writes:
Another idea: introduce some simple tag system in mails sent to -hackers
to be treated specially, e.g:
[...]
How does that sound?
Very much like what debbugs does already.
Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL :
Greg Smith g...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
One unicorn I would like to have here would give the CF app a database
of recent e-mails to pgsql-hackers. I login to the CF app, click on
Add recent submission, and anything matching my e-mail address
appears with a checkbox next to it. Click on the
On 01/19/2012 12:59 PM, Alex Shulgin wrote:
Greg Smithg...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
One unicorn I would like to have here would give the CF app a database
of recent e-mails to pgsql-hackers. I login to the CF app, click on
Add recent submission, and anything matching my e-mail address
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
On 01/19/2012 12:59 PM, Alex Shulgin wrote:
Another idea: introduce some simple tag system in mails sent to -hackers
to be treated specially, e.g:
@fest add-to-current
to add new patch to the commit fest currently in progress, or
@fest
Excerpts from Alex Shulgin's message of jue ene 19 15:41:54 -0300 2012:
PS: yes, I could just copy message id from the sent mail in my MUA, but
I like to make sure links I post aren't broke, so still I'll need to
wait until archives catches up to double check.
I find this a bad excuse. If
On 01/19/2012 01:41 PM, Alex Shulgin wrote:
With the proposed approach it would only take me to include
@fest comment Patch applies cleanly
and possibly
@fest status Needs Review
to update the patch status and that'd be it.
It will be easy if you get it right. My point was that it's
Excerpts from Greg Smith's message of lun ene 16 19:25:50 -0300 2012:
On 01/16/2012 03:48 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
I'll also point out that the process for *applying* a patch, if you
don't subscribe to hackers and keep archives around on your personal
machine for months, is also very
On mån, 2012-01-16 at 17:25 -0500, Greg Smith wrote:
The most reasonable answer to this is for people to publish a git repo
URL in addition to the official submission of changes to the list in
patch form.
Note that the original complaint was that for the occasional reviewer,
the current
On 01/16/2012 05:40 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
It's expected that we'll get a more reasonable interface to attachments,
one that will allow you to download patches separately. (Currently,
attachments that have mime types other than text/plain are already
downloadable separately).
Are you
On 17/01/2012 17:50, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Excerpts from Matteo Beccati's message of mar ene 17 12:33:27 -0300 2012:
My proof of concept archive for the hackers ML site is still online, in
case anyone has trouble downloading the patches or just wants to have
the full thread handy.
I was
On 17/01/2012 18:10, Matteo Beccati wrote:
On 17/01/2012 17:50, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Excerpts from Matteo Beccati's message of mar ene 17 12:33:27 -0300 2012:
My proof of concept archive for the hackers ML site is still online, in
case anyone has trouble downloading the patches or just wants
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
On 01/16/2012 05:40 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
It's expected that we'll get a more reasonable interface to attachments,
one that will allow you to download patches separately. (Currently,
attachments that have mime types other than text/plain are
On 01/17/2012 11:50 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On mån, 2012-01-16 at 17:25 -0500, Greg Smith wrote:
The most reasonable answer to this is for people to publish a git repo
URL in addition to the official submission of changes to the list in
patch form.
Note that the original complaint was that
Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mar ene 17 14:24:05 -0300 2012:
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
On 01/16/2012 05:40 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
It's expected that we'll get a more reasonable interface to attachments,
one that will allow you to download patches separately.
Excerpts from Matteo Beccati's message of mar ene 17 12:33:27 -0300 2012:
On 16/01/2012 23:40, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Excerpts from Greg Smith's message of lun ene 16 19:25:50 -0300 2012:
On 01/16/2012 03:48 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
I'll also point out that the process for *applying*
On 16/01/2012 23:40, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Excerpts from Greg Smith's message of lun ene 16 19:25:50 -0300 2012:
On 01/16/2012 03:48 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
I'll also point out that the process for *applying* a patch, if you
don't subscribe to hackers and keep archives around on your
Excerpts from Andrew Dunstan's message of mar ene 17 13:50:20 -0300 2012:
On 01/16/2012 05:40 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
It's expected that we'll get a more reasonable interface to attachments,
one that will allow you to download patches separately. (Currently,
attachments that have mime
Excerpts from Alvaro Herrera's message of mar ene 17 22:23:13 -0300 2012:
Excerpts from Andrew Dunstan's message of mar ene 17 13:50:20 -0300 2012:
On 01/16/2012 05:40 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
It's expected that we'll get a more reasonable interface to attachments,
one that will
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 3:45 AM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 09:37, Greg Smith g...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 01/15/2012 03:17 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
And FWIW, I'd find it a lot more useful for the CF app to have the
ability to post *reviews* in it,
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 18:57, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 3:45 AM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 09:37, Greg Smith g...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 01/15/2012 03:17 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
And FWIW, I'd find it a lot
On 1/14/12 8:44 PM, Greg Smith wrote:
Second, e-mail provides some level of validation that patches being
submitted are coming from the person they claim. We currently reject
patches that are only shared with the community on the web, via places
like github. The process around this mailing
Excerpts from Josh Berkus's message of lun ene 16 17:48:41 -0300 2012:
Putting submitters aside, I have to say based on teaching people how to
use the CF stuff on Thursday night that the process of submitting a
review of a patch is VERY unintuitive, or in the words of one reviewer
I mean, is email arcane? Surely not. Are summary lines arcane? Give
me a break. So the only real complain point here is message-id, which
normally people don't care about and don't even know they exist. So
they have to learn about it.
The complaint is that the reviewer is expected to
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
Excerpts from Josh Berkus's message of lun ene 16 17:48:41 -0300 2012:
Putting submitters aside, I have to say based on teaching people how to
use the CF stuff on Thursday night that the process of submitting a
Excerpts from Jeff Janes's message of lun ene 16 18:37:59 -0300 2012:
I mean,
if getting a message-id from Gmail is all that complicated, please
complain to Google.
But after digging the message-id out of gmail and entering it into the
commitfest app, the resulting link is broken
On 01/16/2012 03:48 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
3. Dig the messageID out of your sent mail.
4. Add a comment to the patch, type Review with the messageID, and
ideally a short summary comment of the review.
This is the time consuming part that would benefit the most from some
automation. The
On 01/16/2012 05:25 PM, Greg Smith wrote:
The most reasonable answer to this is for people to publish a git repo
URL in addition to the official submission of changes to the list in
patch form. And momentum toward doing that just keeps going up, even
among longer term contributors who
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 05:44, Greg Smith g...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 01/14/2012 10:49 PM, Gurjeet Singh wrote:
So lets make it easy for the patch submitter to start the process. I
propose that we have a page in the CF application where people can
upload/attach the patch, and the app posts
On 01/15/2012 03:17 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
And FWIW, I'd find it a lot more useful for the CF app to have the
ability to post *reviews* in it, that would end up being properly
threaded.
Next you'll be saying we should have some sort of web application to
help with the whole review
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 09:37, Greg Smith g...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 01/15/2012 03:17 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
And FWIW, I'd find it a lot more useful for the CF app to have the
ability to post *reviews* in it, that would end up being properly
threaded.
Next you'll be saying we
On 01/14/2012 10:49 PM, Gurjeet Singh wrote:
So lets make it easy for the patch submitter to start the process. I
propose that we have a page in the CF application where people can
upload/attach the patch, and the app posts the patch to -hackers and
uses the post URL to create the CF entry.
32 matches
Mail list logo
