Giles Lean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Rod Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> ALTER TABLE FKTABLE ADD FOREIGN KEY(ftest1) references
>>> pktable(ptest1);
>>> NOTICE: ALTER TABLE will create implicit trigger(s) for FOREIGN KEY
>>> check(s)
>>> + ERROR: Relation "pg_temp_5"."" does not exis
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yep, and he couldn't reproduce it either, and on a different platform.
> I think that indicates we do have a problem in there, it just doesn't
> show very often.
I agree, this looks a lot like a low-probability bug. But how to attack
it when we can't
Yep, and he couldn't reproduce it either, and on a different platform.
I think that indicates we do have a problem in there, it just doesn't
show very often. He even got ASCII garbage in the error message.
---
Rod Taylor
Rod, are you still seeing this failure?
---
Rod Taylor wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-09-04 at 22:39, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> >
> > will announce it on -announce tomorrow, if ppl want to take a quick look
> > at it ... man pages
Marc G. Fournier writes:
> Actually, I just asked for the split, I think it was peter that actually
> did it ... :)
I recall that you thought of the split in order to save bandwidth for
those who didn't need everything. It was expressedly intended that the
-base tarball was usable by itself and
Tom Lane writes:
> Rod Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > SunOS control.shared2 5.7 Generic_106541-20 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-5_10
> > shows an error in ALTER TABLE tests:
>
> > ALTER TABLE FKTABLE ADD FOREIGN KEY(ftest1) references
> > pktable(ptest1);
> > NOTICE: ALTER TABLE will creat
On Fri, 2002-09-06 at 03:14, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> 0On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > OK, so if base isn't compilable, then what is it good for? I don't see
> > > any add-on packages that would make it usable.
> >
> > AFAIR, the only re
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> 0On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > OK, so if base isn't compilable, then what is it good for? I don't see
> > > any add-on packages that would make it usable.
> >
> > AFAIR, the only reason for having the split pac
On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > OK, so if base isn't compilable, then what is it good for? I don't see
> > > any add-on packages that would make it usable.
> >
> > AFAIR, the only reason for having the split packaging
0On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > OK, so if base isn't compilable, then what is it good for? I don't see
> > any add-on packages that would make it usable.
>
> AFAIR, the only reason for having the split packaging is to accommodate
> people who
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > OK, so if base isn't compilable, then what is it good for? I don't see
> > any add-on packages that would make it usable.
>
> AFAIR, the only reason for having the split packaging is to accommodate
> people who are downloading acros
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> OK, so if base isn't compilable, then what is it good for? I don't see
> any add-on packages that would make it usable.
AFAIR, the only reason for having the split packaging is to accommodate
people who are downloading across flaky connections --- less
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier writes:
>
> > Scary, even with removing a load of stuff over to gborg, its still gotten
> > bigger then the last release :)
>
> Not hard to find the culprit:
>
> 7.2:
>
> 3.4Msrc/backend/utils/mb
>
> 7.3:
>
> 9.6Msrc/backend/utils/mb
Wow.
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Hrmm ... that is odd, now that you mention it ... but the file
> > 'distributions' between v7.2 and v7.3beta appear to be the same, so -base-
> > was broken in the old one too?
>
> It was never intended that the "base" tarfile w
"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hrmm ... that is odd, now that you mention it ... but the file
> 'distributions' between v7.2 and v7.3beta appear to be the same, so -base-
> was broken in the old one too?
It was never intended that the "base" tarfile was alone sufficient to do
an
Marc G. Fournier writes:
> Scary, even with removing a load of stuff over to gborg, its still gotten
> bigger then the last release :)
Not hard to find the culprit:
7.2:
3.4Msrc/backend/utils/mb
7.3:
9.6Msrc/backend/utils/mb
--
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Bruce Momjian writes:
> I am confused. Are you saying the base file isn't compilable?
The mb stuff is missing because it used to be optional in the old
splitting scheme. Needs to be rethought.
--
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---(end of broadcast)
On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > On 5 Sep 2002, Manuel Sugawara wrote:
> >
> > > Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
> > > > So it would seem. The utils/mb directory is certainly there in the full
> > > > tarball that I pulled from ftp.us.postgresql.o
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > You need either the 7.3b1.tar.gz (which is everything), or you need to get
> > all the various -*- parts (which are more manageable)
>
> I am confused. Are you saying the base file isn't compilable?
My idea was that it is.
Regards,
Manuel.
--
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On 5 Sep 2002, Manuel Sugawara wrote:
>
> > Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > So it would seem. The utils/mb directory is certainly there in the full
> > > tarball that I pulled from ftp.us.postgresql.org this morning. How did
> > > you acquire your source
"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You need either the 7.3b1.tar.gz (which is everything), or you need to get
> all the various -*- parts (which are more manageable)
Oh, well. Thanks
Regards,
Manuel.
--
No es que no puedan hallar la solución: es que no ven el problema.
G.K. Chest
On 5 Sep 2002, Manuel Sugawara wrote:
> Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > So it would seem. The utils/mb directory is certainly there in the full
> > tarball that I pulled from ftp.us.postgresql.org this morning. How did
> > you acquire your source tree, exactly?
>
> The file is postgr
Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So it would seem. The utils/mb directory is certainly there in the full
> tarball that I pulled from ftp.us.postgresql.org this morning. How did
> you acquire your source tree, exactly?
The file is postgresql-base-7.3b1.tar.gz from
ftp://ftp.postgresql.or
Manuel Sugawara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> or I'm missing something?
So it would seem. The utils/mb directory is certainly there in the full
tarball that I pulled from ftp.us.postgresql.org this morning. How did
you acquire your source tree, exactly?
regards, tom lan
On Thu, 2002-09-05 at 11:19, Tom Lane wrote:
> Rod Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > SunOS control.shared2 5.7 Generic_106541-20 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-5_10
> > shows an error in ALTER TABLE tests:
>
> > ALTER TABLE FKTABLE ADD FOREIGN KEY(ftest1) references
> > pktable(ptest1);
> > NOTI
Guys,
postgresql7.3b1 does not build :-(, seems like a missing multibyte
directory
'
| make[4]: Entering directory
|`/home/masm/download/postgresql-7.3b1/src/backend/utils/time'
| gcc -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -I../../../../sr
Rod Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> SunOS control.shared2 5.7 Generic_106541-20 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-5_10
> shows an error in ALTER TABLE tests:
> ALTER TABLE FKTABLE ADD FOREIGN KEY(ftest1) references
> pktable(ptest1);
> NOTICE: ALTER TABLE will create implicit trigger(s) for FOREIG
On Wed, 2002-09-04 at 22:39, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> will announce it on -announce tomorrow, if ppl want to take a quick look
> at it ... man pages weren't included, but I did regenerate the docs per
> Peter's suggested commands ...
'./configure && make check' passes on i386 FreeBSD.
SunOS
"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> actually, should be a symlink, but until I know the packaging and all is
> well, I'm avoiding put it in there ...
I pulled down the main tarball -- looks good AFAICT.
regards, tom lane
---(end of br
On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 4 Sep 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> >
> > > %ls -lt ~ftp/pub/source/v7.3beta
> >
> > Is this where you're putting it this time? Last time was ~ftp/pub/beta.
>
> actually, should be a symlink,
On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Sep 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> > %ls -lt ~ftp/pub/source/v7.3beta
>
> Is this where you're putting it this time? Last time was ~ftp/pub/beta.
actually, should be a symlink, but until I know the packaging and all is
well, I'm avoiding
On Wed, 4 Sep 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> %ls -lt ~ftp/pub/source/v7.3beta
Is this where you're putting it this time? Last time was ~ftp/pub/beta.
Vince.
--
==
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
will announce it on -announce tomorrow, if ppl want to take a quick look
at it ... man pages weren't included, but I did regenerate the docs per
Peter's suggested commands ...
Scary, even with removing a load of stuff over to gborg, its still gotten
bigger then the last release :)
%ls -lt ~ftp/
33 matches
Mail list logo
