On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 8:07 AM, Andrew Chernow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> You mean that when results are asked in textual representation (the
>>> default), data is sent on network directly as text?
>>
>> You should know that text/binary conversions rarely play a significant
>> role in terms of
You mean that when results are asked in textual representation (the default),
data is sent on network directly as text?
yes.
You should know that text/binary conversions rarely play a significant
role in terms of performance. There are exceptions...large bytea
columns, or enormous sets of i
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 3:29 AM, Matthieu Imbert
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jeroen Vermeulen wrote:
>> Matthieu Imbert wrote:
>>
>>> scenario 1 - parse the textual representation of all results of
>>> requests to the database and convert textual timestamps to a binary
>>> format that i choose amo
Matthieu Imbert wrote:
You mean that when results are asked in textual representation (the default),
data is sent on network directly as text?
Yes.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To ma
Jeroen Vermeulen wrote:
> Matthieu Imbert wrote:
>
>> scenario 1 - parse the textual representation of all results of
>> requests to the database and convert textual timestamps to a binary
>> format that i choose among those ones (number of microseconds since
>> 2000-01-01, or a structure similar
Matthieu Imbert wrote:
scenario 1 - parse the textual representation of all results of requests to the
database and convert textual timestamps to a binary
format that i choose among those ones (number of microseconds since 2000-01-01,
or a structure similar to pg_tm (but with
microsecond preci
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 4:21 AM, Matthieu Imbert
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear postgresql hackers,
>
> I would like to be able to get results from SQL commands directly in a
> binary format, instead of a textual one. Actually, I want to be able to
> get timestamps with their full precision (mic
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 01:37:44PM +0200, Matthieu Imbert wrote:
> Yes microseconds are available in textual mode but i do want to use binary
> mode. Let me explain why:
> ...
> if i'm correct, it seems obvious that the second scenario is more efficient
> (and less ugly).
I wouldn't bet on scena
Michael Meskes wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 10:21:38AM +0200, Matthieu Imbert wrote:
>> I would like to be able to get results from SQL commands directly in a
>> binary format, instead of a textual one. Actually, I want to be able to
>> get timestamps with their full precision (microsecond).
>
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 10:21:38AM +0200, Matthieu Imbert wrote:
> I would like to be able to get results from SQL commands directly in a
> binary format, instead of a textual one. Actually, I want to be able to
> get timestamps with their full precision (microsecond).
Are you sure you cannot get
Dear postgresql hackers,
I would like to be able to get results from SQL commands directly in a
binary format, instead of a textual one. Actually, I want to be able to
get timestamps with their full precision (microsecond).
googling around i found some threads on this mailing list about this:
htt
11 matches
Mail list logo
