I wrote:
> In any case, I was pointing to that as a reason that btree_gist wasn't
> ready to be in core. It has nothing to do with KNN-ifying the module.
> I would like to see that happen before 9.1, else KNN will go out with
> not very many actual use-cases supported.
However, a larger reason fo
Robert Haas writes:
> 2011/2/17 Oleg Bartunov :
>> We need to fix inet support as Tom complained and then will commit.
> I think those are two separate issues.
Yeah ... also, fixing the inet problem looked to me like it'd probably
be a major compatibility break (change in on-disk index contents)
2011/2/17 Oleg Bartunov :
> We need to fix inet support as Tom complained and then will commit.
I think those are two separate issues.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
We need to fix inet support as Tom complained and then will commit.
Oleg
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011, Robert Haas wrote:
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 8:19 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 7:47 AM, Stephen Frost wrote:
Oleg,
* Oleg Bartunov (o...@sai.msu.su) wrote:
what do you need for do
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 8:19 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 7:47 AM, Stephen Frost wrote:
>> Oleg,
>>
>> * Oleg Bartunov (o...@sai.msu.su) wrote:
>>> what do you need for documentation ? From users point of view we add just
>>> knn support and all examples are available in btree
Oops, thank for remind !
Oleg
On Sat, 12 Feb 2011, Tom Lane wrote:
Jeff Davis writes:
btree_gist is essentially required for exclusion constraints to be
useful in a practical way.
In fact, can you submit it for the next commitfest to be included in
core? That would allow range types and ex
Jeff Davis writes:
> btree_gist is essentially required for exclusion constraints to be
> useful in a practical way.
> In fact, can you submit it for the next commitfest to be included in
> core? That would allow range types and exclusion constraints to be used
> out-of-the-box in 9.2.
> Only if
On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 18:53 +0300, Oleg Bartunov wrote:
> > It sure seems like
> > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/btree-gist.html could be and
> > should be improved, in general.. If this module is really still just a
> > test bed for GiST, then perhaps it's not a big deal..
>
> No, it
Stephen,
On Sat, 12 Feb 2011, Stephen Frost wrote:
Oleg,
* Oleg Bartunov (o...@sai.msu.su) wrote:
what do you need for documentation ? From users point of view we add just
knn support and all examples are available in btree_gist.sql and sql
subdirectory. Contact me directly, if you have quest
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 7:47 AM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> Oleg,
>
> * Oleg Bartunov (o...@sai.msu.su) wrote:
>> what do you need for documentation ? From users point of view we add just
>> knn support and all examples are available in btree_gist.sql and sql
>> subdirectory. Contact me directly, if y
Oleg,
* Oleg Bartunov (o...@sai.msu.su) wrote:
> what do you need for documentation ? From users point of view we add just
> knn support and all examples are available in btree_gist.sql and sql
> subdirectory. Contact me directly, if you have questions.
It sure seems like
http://www.postgresql.or
Stephen,
what do you need for documentation ? From users point of view we add just
knn support and all examples are available in btree_gist.sql and sql
subdirectory. Contact me directly, if you have questions.
Oleg
On Fri, 11 Feb 2011, Stephen Frost wrote:
* Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.co
* Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > Teodor sent it to the list Dec 28, see
> > http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/4D1A1677.80300%40sigaev.ru
[...]
> That having been said, this looks like a fairly mechanical change to a
> contrib module that you and Teodor wrote. So I'd say if
Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Oleg Bartunov wrote:
> > Aha,
> >
> > Teodor sent it to the list Dec 28, see
> > http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/4D1A1677.80300%40sigaev.ru
> >
> > After a month I didn't see any activity on this patch, so I I added it to
> > https://
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Oleg Bartunov wrote:
> Aha,
>
> Teodor sent it to the list Dec 28, see
> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/4D1A1677.80300%40sigaev.ru
>
> After a month I didn't see any activity on this patch, so I I added it to
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/pa
15 matches
Mail list logo
