Zdenek Kotala wrote:
Andrew Dunstan p??e v po 08. 02. 2010 v 20:07 -0500:
Our Solaris *moth members seem to have stopped building. Have we lost them?
Hi Andrew,
The answer is not simple. Yes, we lost Solaris 8 and 9 machines which
was reinstalled and now they are used for different
Andrew Dunstan píše v po 08. 02. 2010 v 20:07 -0500:
Our Solaris *moth members seem to have stopped building. Have we lost them?
Hi Andrew,
The answer is not simple. Yes, we lost Solaris 8 and 9 machines which
was reinstalled and now they are used for different purpose. It was
planned before
2010/2/9 Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net:
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 17:11, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes:
Here's a patch that fixes this. I put it locally for the radius
authentication for now, since we don't use this anywhere else. Should
we
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes:
If someone didn't notice, I have applied that fix and it appears to
have solved it.
... and there was much rejoicing.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 08:20:04PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
MSVC builds are broken from a missing _isnan function on the ECPG tests.
Do we need to link in a math lib or something there?
It looks to me like the problem is that that test is being compiled
without benefit of any
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 9:39 AM, Michael Meskes mes...@postgresql.org wrote:
Actually I was hoping someone with some Windows experience would take a look
at
it or Zoltan would come up with a fix, after all it was his addition. :-)
Looking at the portability header file it appears that
On Tuesday, February 9, 2010, Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org wrote:
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 9:39 AM, Michael Meskes mes...@postgresql.org wrote:
Actually I was hoping someone with some Windows experience would take a look
at
it or Zoltan would come up with a fix, after all it was his addition.
Michael Meskes írta:
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 08:20:04PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
MSVC builds are broken from a missing _isnan function on the ECPG tests.
Do we need to link in a math lib or something there?
It looks to me like the problem is that that test is being compiled
without
For the regression test, I am inclined to just do
#ifdef WIN32
#define isnan(x) _isnan(x)
#define isinf(x) _isinf(x)
#endif
Well the isinf() macro is different in win32.h. I did make a change and
apparently red_bat is now green again. Hopefully that was it.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 02:20, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
Mingw builds are missing in6addr_any in backend/libpq/auth.c, added by a
recent RADIUS support fix. Looks like we might need to include win32.h
in there.
That was discussed already. I
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 13:52, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 02:20, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
Mingw builds are missing in6addr_any in backend/libpq/auth.c, added by a
recent RADIUS support fix. Looks like we
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes:
Here's a patch that fixes this. I put it locally for the radius
authentication for now, since we don't use this anywhere else. Should
we put this in /port/ somewhere, or is this good for now?
How about dropping it in
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 17:11, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes:
Here's a patch that fixes this. I put it locally for the radius
authentication for now, since we don't use this anywhere else. Should
we put this in /port/ somewhere, or is this good
It looks like some recent patches have broken a couple of things on the
buildfarm.
Mingw builds are missing in6addr_any in backend/libpq/auth.c, added by a
recent RADIUS support fix. Looks like we might need to include win32.h
in there.
MSVC builds are broken from a missing _isnan
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
Mingw builds are missing in6addr_any in backend/libpq/auth.c, added by a
recent RADIUS support fix. Looks like we might need to include win32.h
in there.
That was discussed already. I assume Magnus is going to address it
as soon as he gets back
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Our Solaris *moth members seem to have stopped building. Have we lost them?
They're not *all* dead, but it sure looks like Oracle scaled that lab
way back the moment they owned it. I'm surprised any of them are still
alive
16 matches
Mail list logo
