On tis, 2010-09-07 at 20:35 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
I don't plan to try to move this module to core. And it's useless -
other languages has not our problems.
I don't know the details of what you're struggling with, but it's a bit
hard to believe that there is a problem that is absolutely
2010/9/16 Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net:
On tis, 2010-09-07 at 20:35 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
I don't plan to try to move this module to core. And it's useless -
other languages has not our problems.
I don't know the details of what you're struggling with, but it's a bit
hard to
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 08:43:37PM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
2010/9/16 Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net:
On tis, 2010-09-07 at 20:35 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
I don't plan to try to move this module to core. And it's useless
- other languages has not our problems.
I don't know the
Hello
I would to use a special memory context for shared data (based on
mmap) and I like impementation of aset. There is only one difference -
aset is based on malloc and I would to use a mmap.
malloc() is used in AllocSetContextCreate and AllocSetAlloc. These
procedures should be overwritten,
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 4:53 AM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:
I would to use a special memory context for shared data (based on
mmap) and I like impementation of aset. There is only one difference -
aset is based on malloc and I would to use a mmap.
malloc() is used in
2010/9/7 Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 4:53 AM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:
I would to use a special memory context for shared data (based on
mmap) and I like impementation of aset. There is only one difference -
aset is based on malloc and I would
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/9/7 Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 4:53 AM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com
wrote:
I would to use a special memory context for shared data (based on
mmap) and I like
Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com writes:
I would to use a special memory context for shared data (based on
mmap) and I like impementation of aset. There is only one difference -
aset is based on malloc and I would to use a mmap.
malloc() is used in AllocSetContextCreate and
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:
I try to solve performance problems with czech tsearch. I checked
serialization and deserialization, but this decrease load time only to
100ms (from 500) that is too much for
Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of mar sep 07 10:13:12 -0400 2010:
I try to solve performance problems with czech tsearch. I checked
serialization and deserialization, but this decrease load time only to
100ms (from 500) that is too much for us. After some gaming with mmap
I thinking
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of mar sep 07 10:13:12 -0400 2010:
I try to solve performance problems with czech tsearch. I checked
serialization and deserialization, but this decrease load time only to
2010/9/7 Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/9/7 Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 4:53 AM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com
wrote:
I would to use a special memory context for shared
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 12:44 PM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't see how you could do anything with this that you can't do with
the existing implementation. It's not as if you can store pointers
into an mmap'd block and then count on them being valid the next time
you map
2010/9/7 Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 12:44 PM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com
wrote:
I don't see how you could do anything with this that you can't do with
the existing implementation. It's not as if you can store pointers
into an mmap'd block and then
14 matches
Mail list logo
