Re: [HACKERS] checkpoint_flush_after and friends

2016-11-10 Thread Jeff Janes
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Andres Freund wrote: > On 2016-11-10 12:13:05 -0800, Jeff Janes wrote: > > configuration parameters *_flush_after were added in 9.6. They are not > in > > postgresql.conf.sample, but are also not marked GUC_NOT_IN_SAMPLE. Is > this > >

Re: [HACKERS] checkpoint_flush_after and friends

2016-11-10 Thread Andres Freund
On 2016-11-10 12:13:05 -0800, Jeff Janes wrote: > configuration parameters *_flush_after were added in 9.6. They are not in > postgresql.conf.sample, but are also not marked GUC_NOT_IN_SAMPLE. Is this > intentional and/or desirable? Hm? $ grep flush_after

[HACKERS] checkpoint_flush_after and friends

2016-11-10 Thread Jeff Janes
configuration parameters *_flush_after were added in 9.6. They are not in postgresql.conf.sample, but are also not marked GUC_NOT_IN_SAMPLE. Is this intentional and/or desirable? Cheers, Jeff