Re: [HACKERS] compile/install of git

2010-09-20 Thread Andrew Dunstan
On 09/20/2010 01:16 PM, Mark Wong wrote: On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: On 09/20/2010 12:24 PM, Mark Wong wrote: On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 7:59 AM, Bruce Momjianwrote: Well, I can run tests for folks before they apply a patch and "red" the build farm. I can also

Re: [HACKERS] compile/install of git

2010-09-20 Thread Mark Wong
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > > On 09/20/2010 12:24 PM, Mark Wong wrote: >> >> On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 7:59 AM, Bruce Momjian  wrote: >>> >>> Well, I can run tests for folks before they apply a patch and "red" the >>> build farm.  I can also research fixes easier becau

Re: [HACKERS] compile/install of git

2010-09-20 Thread Andrew Dunstan
On 09/20/2010 12:24 PM, Mark Wong wrote: On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 7:59 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote: Well, I can run tests for folks before they apply a patch and "red" the build farm. I can also research fixes easier because I am using the OS, rather than running blind tests. I am just telling

Re: [HACKERS] compile/install of git

2010-09-20 Thread Robert Haas
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Mark Wong wrote: > On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 7:59 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote: >> Andrew Dunstan wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 09/18/2010 10:22 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote: >>> > Dave Page wrote: >>> >> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Bruce Momjian  wrote: >>> >>> FYI, I have co

Re: [HACKERS] compile/install of git

2010-09-20 Thread Mark Wong
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 7:59 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Andrew Dunstan wrote: >> >> >> On 09/18/2010 10:22 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote: >> > Dave Page wrote: >> >> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Bruce Momjian  wrote: >> >>> FYI, I have compiled/installed git 1.7.3.rc2 on my BSD/OS 4.3.1 machine >>

Re: [HACKERS] compile/install of git

2010-09-19 Thread Matthew D. Fuller
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 02:20:53PM -0400 I heard the voice of David Blewett, and lo! it spake thus: > > Sorry for top-posting... I was under the impression that git over http was > just as efficient since 1.6.6 [1]. That's about talking over HTTP to a git server running as CGI; it doesn't help if

Re: [HACKERS] compile/install of git

2010-09-18 Thread Robert Haas
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > On 09/18/2010 02:20 PM, David Blewett wrote: >> >> I was under the impression that git over http was just as efficient since >> 1.6.6 [1]. >> >> David Blewett >> 1. http://github.com/blog/642-smart-http-support >> > > It's hard to keep up, t

Re: [HACKERS] compile/install of git

2010-09-18 Thread Andrew Dunstan
On 09/18/2010 02:20 PM, David Blewett wrote: I was under the impression that git over http was just as efficient since 1.6.6 [1]. David Blewett 1. http://github.com/blog/642-smart-http-support It's hard to keep up, the landscape is still changing quite fast. cheers andrew -- Sent vi

Re: [HACKERS] compile/install of git

2010-09-18 Thread David Blewett
Sorry for top-posting... I was under the impression that git over http was just as efficient since 1.6.6 [1]. David Blewett 1. http://github.com/blog/642-smart-http-support On Sep 18, 2010 12:26 PM, "Andrew Dunstan" wrote: On 09/18/2010 11:37 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > > Andrew Dunstan wrote: >>>

Re: [HACKERS] compile/install of git

2010-09-18 Thread Andrew Dunstan
On 09/18/2010 11:37 AM, Tom Lane wrote: Andrew Dunstan wrote: Test machines belong in the buildfarm. So? People are still going to want to git-ify their buildfarm critters. Right. I was just reacting to Bruce's observation about what people said about his moving off BSD/OS. Bruce Momji

Re: [HACKERS] compile/install of git

2010-09-18 Thread Tom Lane
Andrew Dunstan wrote: >> Test machines belong in the buildfarm. So? People are still going to want to git-ify their buildfarm critters. Bruce Momjian writes: > My big point in posting was to say that compiling git was not the > nightmare I expected it to be. FWIW, I've also successfully instal

Re: [HACKERS] compile/install of git

2010-09-18 Thread Bruce Momjian
Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > > On 09/18/2010 10:22 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Dave Page wrote: > >> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > >>> FYI, I have compiled/installed git 1.7.3.rc2 on my BSD/OS 4.3.1 machine > >>> with the attached minor changes. > >> I thought you were r

Re: [HACKERS] compile/install of git

2010-09-18 Thread Andrew Dunstan
On 09/18/2010 10:22 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote: Dave Page wrote: On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: FYI, I have compiled/installed git 1.7.3.rc2 on my BSD/OS 4.3.1 machine with the attached minor changes. I thought you were replacing that old thing with pile of hardware tha

Re: [HACKERS] compile/install of git

2010-09-18 Thread Bruce Momjian
Dave Page wrote: > On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > FYI, I have compiled/installed git 1.7.3.rc2 on my BSD/OS 4.3.1 machine > > with the attached minor changes. > > I thought you were replacing that old thing with pile of hardware that > Matthew was putting together? Ma

Re: [HACKERS] compile/install of git

2010-09-18 Thread Dave Page
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > FYI, I have compiled/installed git 1.7.3.rc2 on my BSD/OS 4.3.1 machine > with the attached minor changes. I thought you were replacing that old thing with pile of hardware that Matthew was putting together? -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgs

[HACKERS] compile/install of git

2010-09-17 Thread Bruce Momjian
FYI, I have compiled/installed git 1.7.3.rc2 on my BSD/OS 4.3.1 machine with the attached minor changes. -- Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + *** ./git-1.7.3.rc2/Makefile.