Patch applied. Thanks.
---
Teodor Sigaev wrote:
>
>
> > intarray and ltree both seem to be mapping their own declarations onto
> > arrays using largely-similar code. But while intarray fails its
> > regression test, I
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://candle.pha.pa.us/cgi-bin/pgpatches
I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.
---
Teodor Sigaev wrote:
>
>
> > intarray and lt
> intarray and ltree both seem to be mapping their own declarations onto
> arrays using largely-similar code. But while intarray fails its
> regression test, I find ltree still passes. So I'm confused about what
> that code is really doing and don't want to touch it.
Please, apply attached pa
This built and worked on my system.
famous last words, huh?
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Can someone address the intagg issue here, or is the code OK?
>
> ---
>
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Joe Conway and I have just committed some
I have already received a patch that modifies the regression tests and
it seems things are working. However, it would be good for you to take
a look. Fortunately, that can be done anytime during beta. Thanks.
---
Oleg Bar
We'll be back to work next week and look into code.
Oleg
On Sun, 1 Sep 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Can someone address the intagg issue here, or is the code OK?
>
> ---
>
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Joe Conway and I hav
Patch applied. Thanks.
---
mlw wrote:
> This built and worked on my system.
> famous last words, huh?
>
>
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > Can someone address the intagg issue here, or is the code OK?
> >
> > --
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://207.106.42.251/cgi-bin/pgpatches
I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.
---
mlw wrote:
> This built and worked on my system.
Can someone address the intagg issue here, or is the code OK?
---
Tom Lane wrote:
> Joe Conway and I have just committed some changes in the internal
> representation of Postgres arrays: an element-type-OID field is added t
Joe Conway and I have just committed some changes in the internal
representation of Postgres arrays: an element-type-OID field is added to
the array header, and alignment calculations are now done the same way
as in ordinary tuple storage, instead of taking shortcuts. I believe
that these changes
10 matches
Mail list logo
