Am Montag, 21. Januar 2008 schrieb Tom Lane:
%_topdir /home/tgl/rpmwork
then create the directory ~/rpmwork and under it the five directories
BUILD/ RPMS/ SOURCES/ SPECS/ SRPMS/
Some distributions set up their standard build areas under /usr/src to be
world writeable (sticky bit
Hello
is any chance to share standard Makefile and RH Makefile? I am sorry.
I don't understand to Makefile absolutely. It's look so global
Makefile need some changes.
Any help is welcome.
Regards
Pavel Stehule
On 21/01/2008, Devrim GÜNDÜZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Pavel,
Orafce is about
Pavel Stehule [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 21/01/2008, Devrim GÃNDÃZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Orafce is about to be approved for Fedora, and I need help for one of
the review items. Per:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251805#c1
AFAICT, there's nothing wrong with the Makefile.
Tom Lane wrote:
Pavel Stehule [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 21/01/2008, Devrim GÃœNDÃœZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Orafce is about to be approved for Fedora, and I need help for one of
the review items. Per:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251805#c1
AFAICT, there's
Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
Devrim: you should be testing specfiles by building as non-root;
you would have caught this yourself.
Shouldn't one always build RPMs as non-root?
That'd be my advice --- the other way is archaic, not to mention a
bit of a security
Hi,
On Mon, 2008-01-21 at 11:26 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Shouldn't one always build RPMs as non-root?
Probably, if the packager is not lazy ;)
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ , RHCE
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated
Tom Lane wrote:
%install
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
make DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT install
I hope nobody tries building in a directory with a space in it...
--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Ask me about EnterpriseDB's PostGIS support!
Devrim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=DCND=DCZ?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, 2008-01-21 at 11:26 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Shouldn't one always build RPMs as non-root?
Probably, if the packager is not lazy ;)
It's really not hard, it just takes a couple of minutes of one-time
setup. Make a file
Hi,
On Mon, 2008-01-21 at 12:31 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
It's really not hard, it just takes a couple of minutes of one-time
setup.
snip
I *know* how to build the RPMs as non root :-) -- we are talking about
~60 servers to be setup like this . That's why it will take a bit time.
I'll try to
Devrim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=DCND=DCZ?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I *know* how to build the RPMs as non root :-) -- we are talking about
~60 servers to be setup like this . That's why it will take a bit time.
You mean the RPM buildfarm? I would've thought that was already set up
as non-root --- or
Hi,
On Mon, 2008-01-21 at 13:08 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
I *know* how to build the RPMs as non root :-) -- we are talking
about ~60 servers to be setup like this . That's why it will take a
bit time.
You mean the RPM buildfarm?
Yes.
I would've thought that was already set up as
Devrim GÜNDÜZ escribió:
On Mon, 2008-01-21 at 12:31 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
It's really not hard, it just takes a couple of minutes of one-time
setup.
snip
I *know* how to build the RPMs as non root :-) -- we are talking about
~60 servers to be setup like this . That's why it will take
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You don't need to set up all the machines this way, only the one where
you actually write and test the SPEC file.
Well, actually, I'm fairly unhappy that Devrim's skipping the make
check step while building those RPMs (which he must do because it
won't
Hi,
On Mon, 2008-01-21 at 11:17 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Devrim: you should be testing specfiles by building as non-root;
you would have caught this yourself.
Even though it means a lot of work in my current setup, this is what
will happen eventually, especially after the Makefile.regress
14 matches
Mail list logo
