Re: [HACKERS] dblink for 8.4 should work without user-mappings

2010-02-24 Thread Bruce Momjian
What happened to this patch? --- Itagaki Takahiro wrote: contrib/dblink in 8.4 supports a server name by CREATE SERVER for connection string, but it always requires an user-mapping (by CREATE USER MAPPING). However, I

Re: [HACKERS] dblink for 8.4 should work without user-mappings

2010-02-24 Thread Takahiro Itagaki
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote: What happened to this patch? It was rejected because SQL standard always requires an user mapping. I agree about the decision, too. --- Itagaki Takahiro wrote: contrib/dblink in

Re: [HACKERS] dblink for 8.4 should work without user-mappings

2009-06-24 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On Wednesday 24 June 2009 05:42:01 Itagaki Takahiro wrote: contrib/dblink in 8.4 supports a server name by CREATE SERVER for connection string, but it always requires an user-mapping (by CREATE USER MAPPING). However, I think it should work user-mappings because it works when the connection

[HACKERS] dblink for 8.4 should work without user-mappings

2009-06-23 Thread Itagaki Takahiro
contrib/dblink in 8.4 supports a server name by CREATE SERVER for connection string, but it always requires an user-mapping (by CREATE USER MAPPING). However, I think it should work user-mappings because it works when the connection string is passed directly. =# SELECT * FROM