Re: [HACKERS] documentation bug - missing info about unpackaged control files for extension
2012/4/15 Heikki Linnakangas : > On 15.04.2012 13:47, Pavel Stehule wrote: >> >> is somewhere documented sense of foo--unpackaged--version.sql files? > > > See section 35.15.4. Extension Updates, paragraph starting with "The update > mechanism can be used to solve an important special case: converting a > "loose" collection of objects into an extension." > I understand better now. Thank you Pavel > -- > Heikki Linnakangas > EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Re: [HACKERS] documentation bug - missing info about unpackaged control files for extension
On 15.04.2012 13:47, Pavel Stehule wrote: is somewhere documented sense of foo--unpackaged--version.sql files? See section 35.15.4. Extension Updates, paragraph starting with "The update mechanism can be used to solve an important special case: converting a "loose" collection of objects into an extension." -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
[HACKERS] documentation bug - missing info about unpackaged control files for extension
Hello is somewhere documented sense of foo--unpackaged--version.sql files? Regards Pavel -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
