* Andrew Dunstan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> elein wrote:
> >>pg_dump -t will work.
> >
> >Oh, you got me all worked up. I was reading this as a way to
> >dump the CONTENTS of a view not the DEFINITION of a view.
> >I thought someone sneaked in pg_dump of a query in there.
> >
> >
>
> How wou
On Tue, 2006-07-18 at 18:06 -0400, Phil Frost wrote:
> I could really use a --view option to pg_dump (and pg_restore, i
> imagine).
pg_dump -t will work.
-Neil
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
elein wrote:
pg_dump -t will work.
Oh, you got me all worked up. I was reading this as a way to
dump the CONTENTS of a view not the DEFINITION of a view.
I thought someone sneaked in pg_dump of a query in there.
How would you load such a dump, since views are by default select-onl
On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 03:48:52PM -0700, Neil Conway wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-07-18 at 18:06 -0400, Phil Frost wrote:
> > I could really use a --view option to pg_dump (and pg_restore, i
> > imagine).
>
> pg_dump -t will work.
>
> -Neil
>
Oh, you got me all worked up. I was reading this as a w
I could really use a --view option to pg_dump (and pg_restore, i
imagine). This would instruct pg_dump to dump just a named view, much
like --table, --trigger, --function, etc. Could this maybe be added to a
todo list?
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9:
