Re: [HACKERS] garbage in xml regress test

2016-08-07 Thread Pavel Stehule
2016-08-08 5:44 GMT+02:00 Tom Lane : > Pavel Stehule writes: > > 2016-08-07 23:16 GMT+02:00 Tom Lane : > >> Probably your copy of libxml produces the results in xml_2.out instead. > > > no - it is in expected/xml.out > > No, the

Re: [HACKERS] garbage in xml regress test

2016-08-07 Thread Tom Lane
Pavel Stehule writes: > 2016-08-07 23:16 GMT+02:00 Tom Lane : >> Probably your copy of libxml produces the results in xml_2.out instead. > no - it is in expected/xml.out No, the output you're producing is in results/xml.out, but if the regression

Re: [HACKERS] garbage in xml regress test

2016-08-07 Thread Pavel Stehule
2016-08-07 23:16 GMT+02:00 Tom Lane : > Pavel Stehule writes: > > When I checked result of xml test I found some strange lines in > > expected/xml.out file > > It is little bit strange - regress test reports ok, but diff is not empty > > Probably your

Re: [HACKERS] garbage in xml regress test

2016-08-07 Thread Tom Lane
Pavel Stehule writes: > When I checked result of xml test I found some strange lines in > expected/xml.out file > It is little bit strange - regress test reports ok, but diff is not empty Probably your copy of libxml produces the results in xml_2.out instead.

[HACKERS] garbage in xml regress test

2016-08-07 Thread Pavel Stehule
Hi When I checked result of xml test I found some strange lines in expected/xml.out file It is little bit strange - regress test reports ok, but diff is not empty [pavel@nemesis regress]$ diff results/xml.out expected/xml.out 11a12,13 >^ 63a66,67 > ^ 222a227,228 > & >