On 09/17/2015 09:42 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan writes:
I propose to have the pg_upgrade test honour TEMP_CONFIG as pg_regress
(or its Makefile) does, by applying the patch below. There might be
opther places this should also be done, but this would be a start.
No objection to the con
Andrew Dunstan writes:
> I propose to have the pg_upgrade test honour TEMP_CONFIG as pg_regress
> (or its Makefile) does, by applying the patch below. There might be
> opther places this should also be done, but this would be a start.
No objection to the concept, but I wonder if the -f test sho
I propose to have the pg_upgrade test honour TEMP_CONFIG as pg_regress
(or its Makefile) does, by applying the patch below. There might be
opther places this should also be done, but this would be a start. The
motivation is to see if it stops the errors we often see on the somewhat
slow axolotl
