Thanks for the analysis. I have removed mention of the -fast option
from the Solaris FAQ.
---
Kenneth Marshall wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 04:09:18PM +0200, Zdenek Kotala wrote:
> > Tom Lane napsal(a):
> > >Zdenek Ko
On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 04:09:18PM +0200, Zdenek Kotala wrote:
> Tom Lane napsal(a):
> >Zdenek Kotala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>The problem was generated, because -fast option was set only for the
> >>compiler and not for the linker. Linker takes wrong version of
> >>libraries. If -fast i
Tom Lane napsal(a):
Zdenek Kotala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
The problem was generated, because -fast option was set only for the
compiler and not for the linker. Linker takes wrong version of
libraries. If -fast is set for both then horology test is OK, but
question was if float optimaliza
Zdenek Kotala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The problem was generated, because -fast option was set only for the
> compiler and not for the linker. Linker takes wrong version of
> libraries. If -fast is set for both then horology test is OK, but
> question was if float optimalization should ge
Andrew Dunstan napsal(a):
Tom Lane wrote:
Zdenek Kotala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
But the question is if the "-fast" flag is good for postgres. The
-fast flag sets "brutal" floating point optimization and some
operation should have less precision. Is possible verify that
floating point
Josh Berkus napsal(a):
Zdenek,
Hmmm ... we're not using the -fast option for the standard PostgreSQL
packages. Where did you start using it?
Yes, I know. The -fast option generates architecture depending code and
it is not possible use in common packages. I found out this option when
I a
Zdenek,
Hmmm ... we're not using the -fast option for the standard PostgreSQL
packages. Where did you start using it?
--
--Josh
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will i
Tom,
On 9/26/06 9:15 AM, "Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> ! | @ 6 years | @ 5 years 12 mons 5 days 6 hours
>
>> Doesn't this look odd regardless of what bad results come back from the
>> FP library?
>
> It looks exact
Zdenek,
Zdenek Kotala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
But the question is if the "-fast" flag is good for postgres. The
-fast flag sets "brutal" floating point optimization and some
operation should have less precision. Is possible verify that
floating point operation works well?
That's a prett
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ! | @ 6 years | @ 5 years 12 mons 5 days 6 hours
> Doesn't this look odd regardless of what bad results come back from the
> FP library?
It looks exactly like the sort of platform-dependent rounding issue that
Bruce and Michae
Bruce Momjian napsal(a):
Zdenek Kotala wrote:
I tried regression test with Postgres Beta and horology test field. See
attached log. It appears few month ago - see
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-ports/2006-06/msg4.php
I used Sun Studio 11 with -fast flag and SPARC platform.
Are you
[HACKERS] horo(r)logy test fail on solaris (again and
Zdenek Kotala wrote:
> I tried regression test with Postgres Beta and horology test field. See
> attached log. It appears few month ago - see
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-ports/2006-06/msg4.php
> I used Sun Studio 1
Tom Lane napsal(a):
Zdenek Kotala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
But the question is if the "-fast" flag is good for postgres. The -fast
flag sets "brutal" floating point optimization and some operation should
have less precision. Is possible verify that floating point operation
works well?
Tha
Tom Lane wrote:
Zdenek Kotala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
But the question is if the "-fast" flag is good for postgres. The -fast
flag sets "brutal" floating point optimization and some operation should
have less precision. Is possible verify that floating point operation
works well?
Zdenek Kotala wrote:
> I tried regression test with Postgres Beta and horology test field. See
> attached log. It appears few month ago - see
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-ports/2006-06/msg4.php
> I used Sun Studio 11 with -fast flag and SPARC platform.
Are you looking for ways to c
Zdenek Kotala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> But the question is if the "-fast" flag is good for postgres. The -fast
> flag sets "brutal" floating point optimization and some operation should
> have less precision. Is possible verify that floating point operation
> works well?
That's a pretty go
I tried regression test with Postgres Beta and horology test field. See
attached log. It appears few month ago - see
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-ports/2006-06/msg4.php
I used Sun Studio 11 with -fast flag and SPARC platform.
I played little bit with cc flags and following flags wo
17 matches
Mail list logo
