On 6/6/17 13:24, Petr Jelinek wrote:
> On 06/06/17 15:07, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On 6/6/17 06:51, Petr Jelinek wrote:
>>> On 06/06/17 04:19, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
The logical replication code is supposed to use the subscription name as
the fallback_application_name, but in some
On 06/06/17 15:07, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 6/6/17 06:51, Petr Jelinek wrote:
>> On 06/06/17 04:19, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>> The logical replication code is supposed to use the subscription name as
>>> the fallback_application_name, but in some cases it uses the slot name,
>>> which could
On 6/6/17 06:51, Petr Jelinek wrote:
> On 06/06/17 04:19, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> The logical replication code is supposed to use the subscription name as
>> the fallback_application_name, but in some cases it uses the slot name,
>> which could be different. See attached patch to correct this.
On 06/06/17 04:19, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> The logical replication code is supposed to use the subscription name as
> the fallback_application_name, but in some cases it uses the slot name,
> which could be different. See attached patch to correct this.
>
Hmm, well the differentiation has a
The logical replication code is supposed to use the subscription name as
the fallback_application_name, but in some cases it uses the slot name,
which could be different. See attached patch to correct this.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development,
