Jordan Deitch writes:
> However, I don't see consistency between the results of these two
> statements:
> select jsonb_agg((select 1 where false));
> select sum((select 1 where false));
Well, SUM() is defined to ignore null input values, which is not too
surprising as it couldn't do anything ver
Thank you for responding!
Good points.
However, I don't see consistency between the results of these two
statements:
select jsonb_agg((select 1 where false));
select sum((select 1 where false));
Therefore another option I would like to suggest is returning the same null
value-types for the sum(
Jordan Deitch writes:
> A json(b)_agg() will produce the following result when no results are
> passed in:
> "[null]"
> per:
> select jsonb_agg((select 1 where false));
Looks fine to me.
> I believe, generally speaking, '[]' would be the more appropriate output.
Why? What you gave it was one n
Hello!
I apologize in advanced if this has been previously discussed;
A json(b)_agg() will produce the following result when no results are
passed in:
"[null]"
per:
select jsonb_agg((select 1 where false));
I believe, generally speaking, '[]' would be the more appropriate output.
Would postg
