Re: [HACKERS] libpq URI and regression testing

2012-07-06 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Excerpts from Alex's message of jue abr 19 17:06:05 -0300 2012: Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes: On tor, 2012-04-19 at 00:13 +0300, Alex wrote: +#!/usr/bin/env perl Don't do that. Call the script using $(PERL) from the makefile. Thank you for the suggestion. Attached v2

Re: [HACKERS] libpq URI and regression testing

2012-04-19 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On tor, 2012-04-19 at 00:13 +0300, Alex wrote: +#!/usr/bin/env perl Don't do that. Call the script using $(PERL) from the makefile. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Re: [HACKERS] libpq URI and regression testing

2012-04-19 Thread Alex
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes: On tor, 2012-04-19 at 00:13 +0300, Alex wrote: +#!/usr/bin/env perl Don't do that. Call the script using $(PERL) from the makefile. Thank you for the suggestion. Attached v2 does just this (while keeping a more commonly found shebang line in the

Re: [HACKERS] libpq URI and regression testing

2012-04-18 Thread Alex
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes: On tis, 2012-04-17 at 10:47 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: What's the preferred way to make it automatically tested as much as possible? I know the buildfarm does not run installcheck-world, so if we want it there, it'd need a bit more code on the

Re: [HACKERS] libpq URI and regression testing

2012-04-18 Thread Alex
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes: That's one reason for that, but there are probably others in the way of making this fully portable and automatable. This test setup also appears to labor under the illusion that we live in a Unix-only world. And for no good reason that I can tell.

[HACKERS] libpq URI and regression testing

2012-04-17 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Hi, When I committed Alex Shulgin's patch to add URI support to libpq, I included the test harness as well. However, due to it being in a separate subdirectory that did not previously had tests, it's not being run by buildfarm. It's not considered in make installcheck-world either. What's

Re: [HACKERS] libpq URI and regression testing

2012-04-17 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On tis, 2012-04-17 at 10:47 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: What's the preferred way to make it automatically tested as much as possible? I know the buildfarm does not run installcheck-world, so if we want it there, it'd need a bit more code on the client side. I think it would be wise to have

Re: [HACKERS] libpq URI and regression testing

2012-04-17 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Excerpts from Peter Eisentraut's message of mar abr 17 15:41:04 -0300 2012: On tis, 2012-04-17 at 10:47 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: What's the preferred way to make it automatically tested as much as possible? I know the buildfarm does not run installcheck-world, so if we want it there,

Re: [HACKERS] libpq URI and regression testing

2012-04-17 Thread Andrew Dunstan
On 04/17/2012 02:47 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: Excerpts from Peter Eisentraut's message of mar abr 17 15:41:04 -0300 2012: On tis, 2012-04-17 at 10:47 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: What's the preferred way to make it automatically tested as much as possible? I know the buildfarm does not run

Re: [HACKERS] libpq URI and regression testing

2012-04-17 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Excerpts from Andrew Dunstan's message of mar abr 17 16:03:50 -0300 2012: That's one reason for that, but there are probably others in the way of making this fully portable and automatable. This test setup also appears to labor under the illusion that we live in a Unix-only world. And