Tom Lane said:
Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am about to redo the patch that would allow tagging of log lines
with info via a printf-style string.
Any comments or suggestions before I start?
I think Bruce already applied the previous version of your patch.
Not that I can see.
I am about to redo the patch that would allow tagging of log lines with
info via a printf-style string.
Current plans are to call the config parameter log_line_info and
implement the following escapes:
%U = user
%D = database
%T = timestamp
%P = pid
%L = session log line number
%C = sessionid
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
I am about to redo the patch that would allow tagging of log lines with
info via a printf-style string.
Current plans are to call the config parameter log_line_info and
implement the following escapes:
%U = user
%D = database
%T = timestamp
%P = pid
%L = session log line
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
I am about to redo the patch that would allow tagging of log lines with
info via a printf-style string.
Current plans are to call the config parameter log_line_info and
implement the following escapes:
%U = user
%D = database
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
I am about to redo the patch that would allow tagging of log lines
with info via a printf-style string.
Current plans are to call the config parameter log_line_info and
implement the following escapes:
%U = user
%D = database
%T = timestamp
%P =
Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am about to redo the patch that would allow tagging of log lines with
info via a printf-style string.
Any comments or suggestions before I start?
I think Bruce already applied the previous version of your patch. No
problem with yanking it out for a
