On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 07:41:15AM -0700, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Since there seems to be interest in discussing incremental
> maintenance of materialized views *now*, I'm starting this thread
> to try to avoid polluting unrelated threads with the discussion. I
> don't intend to spend a lot of
Since there seems to be interest in discussing incremental
maintenance of materialized views *now*, I'm starting this thread
to try to avoid polluting unrelated threads with the discussion. I
don't intend to spend a lot of time on it until the CF in progress
completes, but at that point the work
On 2013-06-17 16:41 +02:00, Kevin Grittner wrote:
Since there seems to be interest in discussing incremental
maintenance of materialized views *now*, I'm starting this thread
to try to avoid polluting unrelated threads with the discussion. I
don't intend to spend a lot of time on it until the
On 17 June 2013 15:41, Kevin Grittner kgri...@ymail.com wrote:
Since there seems to be interest in discussing incremental
maintenance of materialized views *now*
Since your earlier complaint, I specificaly said I was happy to wait
to discuss that. Why have you raised this now?
--
Simon Riggs
On 17 June 2013 15:41, Kevin Grittner kgri...@ymail.com wrote:
While I have yet to look in detail at the mechanism for capturing
the initial delta on the base tables, the two fairly obvious
candidates are to stuff the before and after images into a
tuplestore or temp table as base table
