Re: [HACKERS] missing COMMENT ON objects
I notice you cannot COMMENT ON the following: * Cast * Conversion * Operator class Is that a deliberate omission, or is it an oversight? Unimplemented feature AFAIR. BTW, if you feel like doing something about this, COMMENT ON LARGE OBJECT oid would be good too. * COMMENT ON [ CAST | CONVERSION | OPERATOR CLASS | LARGE OBJECT ] Bruce - want to make this a TODO? May as well assign it to me - I'll have a play with it. I assume this is a post-7.4 item? Chris ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
Re: [HACKERS] missing COMMENT ON objects
Added, yes, a 7.5 item. --- Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: I notice you cannot COMMENT ON the following: * Cast * Conversion * Operator class Is that a deliberate omission, or is it an oversight? Unimplemented feature AFAIR. BTW, if you feel like doing something about this, COMMENT ON LARGE OBJECT oid would be good too. * COMMENT ON [ CAST | CONVERSION | OPERATOR CLASS | LARGE OBJECT ] Bruce - want to make this a TODO? May as well assign it to me - I'll have a play with it. I assume this is a post-7.4 item? Chris ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html -- Bruce Momjian| http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup.| Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
Re: [HACKERS] missing COMMENT ON objects
Unimplemented feature AFAIR. BTW, if you feel like doing something about this, COMMENT ON LARGE OBJECT oid would be good too. * COMMENT ON [ CAST | CONVERSION | OPERATOR CLASS | LARGE OBJECT ] Bruce - want to make this a TODO? May as well assign it to me - I'll have a play with it. I assume this is a post-7.4 item? Actually, what about COMMENT ON LANGUAGE as well? Chris ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [HACKERS] missing COMMENT ON objects
Added. --- Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: Unimplemented feature AFAIR. BTW, if you feel like doing something about this, COMMENT ON LARGE OBJECT oid would be good too. * COMMENT ON [ CAST | CONVERSION | OPERATOR CLASS | LARGE OBJECT ] Bruce - want to make this a TODO? May as well assign it to me - I'll have a play with it. I assume this is a post-7.4 item? Actually, what about COMMENT ON LANGUAGE as well? Chris ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Bruce Momjian| http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup.| Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
[HACKERS] missing COMMENT ON objects
Hi, I notice you cannot COMMENT ON the following: * Cast * Conversion * Operator class Docs: http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/sql-comment.html Is that a deliberate omission, or is it an oversight? If it's deliberate, it seems kind of arbitrary. Or have the docs just not been updated? Chris ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
Re: [HACKERS] missing COMMENT ON objects
Christopher Kings-Lynne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I notice you cannot COMMENT ON the following: * Cast * Conversion * Operator class Is that a deliberate omission, or is it an oversight? Unimplemented feature AFAIR. BTW, if you feel like doing something about this, COMMENT ON LARGE OBJECT oid would be good too. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
