On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 2:36 AM, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 4:47 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Manuel Kniep wrote:
>>> I’m missing the PG_RETURN_UINT16 macro in fmgr.h
>>> Since we already have the PG_GETARG_UINT16 macro
>>> I guess it makes sense to
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 4:47 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Manuel Kniep wrote:
>> I’m missing the PG_RETURN_UINT16 macro in fmgr.h
>> Since we already have the PG_GETARG_UINT16 macro
>> I guess it makes sense to to have it.
>>
>> here is the trivial patch for it.
>
> I
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Manuel Kniep wrote:
> I’m missing the PG_RETURN_UINT16 macro in fmgr.h
> Since we already have the PG_GETARG_UINT16 macro
> I guess it makes sense to to have it.
>
> here is the trivial patch for it.
I see no reason not to add this. Anyone else want to object?
-
Hi,
I’m missing the PG_RETURN_UINT16 macro in fmgr.h
Since we already have the PG_GETARG_UINT16 macro
I guess it makes sense to to have it.
here is the trivial patch for it.
add_pg_return_uint16_macro.patch
Description: Binary data
cheers
Manuel
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (