Re: [HACKERS] missing PG_RETURN_UINT16

2014-08-06 Thread Robert Haas
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 2:36 AM, Fujii Masao wrote: > On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 4:47 AM, Robert Haas wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Manuel Kniep wrote: >>> I’m missing the PG_RETURN_UINT16 macro in fmgr.h >>> Since we already have the PG_GETARG_UINT16 macro >>> I guess it makes sense to

Re: [HACKERS] missing PG_RETURN_UINT16

2014-08-05 Thread Fujii Masao
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 4:47 AM, Robert Haas wrote: > On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Manuel Kniep wrote: >> I’m missing the PG_RETURN_UINT16 macro in fmgr.h >> Since we already have the PG_GETARG_UINT16 macro >> I guess it makes sense to to have it. >> >> here is the trivial patch for it. > > I

Re: [HACKERS] missing PG_RETURN_UINT16

2014-08-05 Thread Robert Haas
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Manuel Kniep wrote: > I’m missing the PG_RETURN_UINT16 macro in fmgr.h > Since we already have the PG_GETARG_UINT16 macro > I guess it makes sense to to have it. > > here is the trivial patch for it. I see no reason not to add this. Anyone else want to object? -

[HACKERS] missing PG_RETURN_UINT16

2014-08-04 Thread Manuel Kniep
Hi, I’m missing the PG_RETURN_UINT16 macro in fmgr.h Since we already have the PG_GETARG_UINT16 macro I guess it makes sense to to have it. here is the trivial patch for it. add_pg_return_uint16_macro.patch Description: Binary data cheers Manuel -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (