[HACKERS] missing tags

2010-10-02 Thread Andrew Dunstan
There are commit messages from about 22 hours ago that say that the upcoming releases have been tagged, but I don't see the corresponding tags when I list out the tags in my repo (and there has been a commit since then). I'm not sure where the release procedures are documented - I couldn't

Re: [HACKERS] missing tags

2010-10-02 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 13:36, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:  There are commit messages from about 22 hours ago that say that the upcoming releases have been tagged, but I don't see the corresponding tags when I list out the tags in my repo (and there has been a commit since then).

Re: [HACKERS] missing tags

2010-10-02 Thread Tom Lane
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes: On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 13:36, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote: There are commit messages from about 22 hours ago that say that the This was intentional - to wait with the tags until the tarballs have been verified *and published*, so we

Re: [HACKERS] missing tags

2010-10-02 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 16:08, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes: On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 13:36, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote: I think the confusion is from the use of tagged in the commit message Possibly Marc should adopt the habit of

Re: [HACKERS] missing tags

2010-10-02 Thread Andrew Dunstan
On 10/02/2010 10:45 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote: On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 16:08, Tom Lanet...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: Magnus Hagandermag...@hagander.net writes: On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 13:36, Andrew Dunstanand...@dunslane.net wrote: I think the confusion is from the use of tagged in the commit

Re: [HACKERS] missing tags

2010-10-02 Thread Marc G. Fournier
Agreed, I thought of that when Andrew sent the original ... On Sat, 2 Oct 2010, Magnus Hagander wrote: On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 16:08, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes: On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 13:36, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote: I