On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 10:23 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Great. Are you handling creating the new branch?
>
> Yeah, I guess. I've made most of them lately.
I'll do it if you want.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--
Sent via pgsql-hacke
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 10:35:44PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> > It sounds like you are saying that the branch is to happen before the
> > pgindent run. Am I missing something?
>
> I read it as pgindent then branch.
OK, good.
--
Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us
Bruce Momjian writes:
> It sounds like you are saying that the branch is to happen before the
> pgindent run. Am I missing something?
I read it as pgindent then branch.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make cha
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 10:31:35PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> > I am confused --- are you pgindenting just HEAD and not 9.6? Why?
>
> The point is to pgindent while they're still the same.
So I read this:
> >> +1, I was planning to do that myself.
>
> > Great. Are you h
Bruce Momjian writes:
> I am confused --- are you pgindenting just HEAD and not 9.6? Why?
The point is to pgindent while they're still the same.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscriptio
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 10:23:14PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas writes:
> > On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 5:04 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Robert Haas writes:
> >>> Would anyone mind too much if I refreshed typedefs.list and
> >>> re-indented the whole tree before we branch?
>
> >> +1, I was pla
Robert Haas writes:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 5:04 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Robert Haas writes:
>>> Would anyone mind too much if I refreshed typedefs.list and
>>> re-indented the whole tree before we branch?
>> +1, I was planning to do that myself.
> Great. Are you handling creating the new br
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 5:04 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas writes:
>> Would anyone mind too much if I refreshed typedefs.list and
>> re-indented the whole tree before we branch?
>
> +1, I was planning to do that myself.
Great. Are you handling creating the new branch? If so, it probably
ma
Robert Haas writes:
> Would anyone mind too much if I refreshed typedefs.list and
> re-indented the whole tree before we branch?
+1, I was planning to do that myself.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make change
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 04:02:27PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Would anyone mind too much if I refreshed typedefs.list and
> re-indented the whole tree before we branch? There's not too much
> churn at the moment, and I feel like it would be nice to start the
> cycle in as clean a state a
Hi,
Would anyone mind too much if I refreshed typedefs.list and
re-indented the whole tree before we branch? There's not too much
churn at the moment, and I feel like it would be nice to start the
cycle in as clean a state as possible.
Current results of this attached.
--
Robert Haas
Enterpris
11 matches
Mail list logo
